Skip to main content

Impact of the Three Mile Island Accident as Perceived by Those Living in the Surrounding Community

  • Chapter
The Analysis of Actual Versus Perceived Risks

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 1))

  • 195 Accesses

Abstract

The accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2 on March 28, 1979, presented the world with a unique historical example for study. It illustrated how people react to what the press labeled a “nuclear disease.” This was a “disaster” without noise or evidence of damage. The TMI community could not see or feel or sense anything other than what was transmitted in the form of news reports. Under such circumstances people seem to react to the flavor (upbeat, downbeat) or pattern (relaxing, worsening) of the news reports and particularly on the basis of preconceptions of the risks involved. On March 30th, when approximately one-third of Middletown left the area, many were unable to utilize a logical thought process in arriving at a course of action. Still today, two years after the accident, many residents have mixed feelings about nuclear energy and TMI. It is difficult to accept the fact that off-the-island, for all practical purposes, the accident had no effect. Even more difficult to accept is the conclusion that had the accident progressed further than it did (melt down) the containment would still not have been breeched. There would have been no “China Syndrome.”

President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island.

Division of Science, Engineering & Technology, Pennsylvania State University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. G. Kemeny, B. Babbitt, P. E. Haggerty, C. Lewis, P. A. Marks, C. B. Marrett, L. McBride, H. C. McPherson, R. W. Peterson, T. H. Pigford, T. B. Taylor, and A. D. Trunk, Report of the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. D. Trunk and E. V. Trunk, Three Mile Island: A Resident’s Perspective, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 365, New York, N.Y. (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Media Institute, Television Evening News Covers Nuclear Energy, Washington, D.C. (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. B. Kraybill, Three Mile Island: Local Residents Speak Out: A Public Opinion Poll, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. B. Flynn, Three Mile Island Telephone Survey: Preliminary Report on Procedures and Findings, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. P. Shearer, Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident Community Impact Study on Real Estate, Greater Harrisburg Board of Realtors, Harrisburg, Pennsyalvania (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. B. Flynn and J. A. Chalmers, The Social and Economic Effects of the Accident at Three Mile Island: Findings to Date, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. H. Plosila, The Socio-Economic Impacts of the Three Mile Island Accident: Final Report, Governor’s Office of Policy and Planning, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. R. Hickey, Jr., Impact of the 1979 Accident at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station on Recreational Fishing in the Susquehanna River, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. E. Gears, G. LaRoche, J. Cable, B. Jaroslow, and D. Smith, Investigations of Reported Plant and Animal Health Effects in the Three Mile Island Area, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trunk, A.D., Trunk, E.V. (1983). Impact of the Three Mile Island Accident as Perceived by Those Living in the Surrounding Community. In: Covello, V.T., Flamm, W.G., Rodricks, J.V., Tardiff, R.G. (eds) The Analysis of Actual Versus Perceived Risks. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3760-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3760-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3762-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3760-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics