Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 1))

  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

The regulation of exposure to low-dose carcinogens is beset with difficulties and uncertainties. Ethical considerations rule out the use of human experiments to determine risk from low dose carcinogens. Even if animal experiments are used, a number of animals would be required to test for carcinogens at low doses. Nevertheless, safe levels of human exposure must be set. Thus, methods based on extrapolation from animal experiments with a relatively small number of animals exposed to high dosages of potential carcinogens are being adopted as the basis for regulating human exposure to low dosages of carcinogens [1]. Since it has been impossible to determine a dosage level at which there is no cancer hazard, an alternate “virtually safe” dose method has become common. The virtually safe dose is a dose at which the cancer risk is no greater than some very small risk, say, a one-in 105, 106, or 108 chance of developing cancer in a lifetime. For example, an action level of 100 μg/liter for total trihalomethanes in drinking water has been proposed by the EPA as prudent for these animal carcinogens [2]: the risk of cancer resulting from low-dose x-ray exposure has been determined in this way and used to establish acceptable x-ray dosage levels for mammography screening [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. National Research Council, Drinking Water and Health, Washington: National Academy of Sciences (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Federal Register, Interim primary drinking water regulations, Part II EPA: 5756–5780 (February 9, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailar, J. C., Mammography : A contrary view, Annals of Internal Medicine, 84:77–84 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doll, R., and Hill, A. B., Lung cancer and other causes of death in relation to smoking. A second report on the mortality of British doctors, British Medical Journal, 2:1071–1081 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond, E. C., and Horn, P., Smoking and death rates — report on 44 months of follow-up of 187,783 men - 1. Total Mortality, Journal of Amer. Med. Assoc., 166(10) : 1159–1172 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorn, H. D., Tobacco consumption and mortality from cancer and other diseases, Public Health Reports, 74:581–593 (1959).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahn, H. A., The Dorn study of smoking and mortality among U.S. veterans; report on 8½. years of observation, in: Epidemiological approaches to the study of cancer and other chronic diseases, W. Haenszel, ed., National Cancer Institute Monograph 19, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Cancer Institute, 1 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mantel, N., An improved Mantel-Bryan procedure for “safety testing” of carcinogens, Cancer Research, 35:865–872 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guess, H. A., and Crump, K. S., Low-dose-rate extrapolation of data from animal carcinogenicity experiments — analysis of a new statistical technique, Math. Biosciences, 32 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartley, H. O., and Sielkin, R. L., Estimation of “safe dose” in carcinogenic experiments — Biometrics, 33:1–30 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoel, D. G., et al., Estimation of risks of irreversible, delayed toxicity, Journal of Toxic Environ. Health, 1:133–151 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gori, G., Low risk cigarettes: a prescription, Science, 194: 1243–46 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guess, H., Crump, and Peto, R., Uncertainty estimates for low-dose-rate extrapolations of animal carcinogenicity data, Cancer Research, 37:3475–3483 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hammond, E. C., Garfinkel, L., Seidman, et al., Some recent findings concerning cigarette smoking, in: Origins of Human Cancer, H. J. Hiat, J. D. Watson, and J. A. Winsten, eds., Cold Spring Harbor, New York, Cold Spring Laboratory (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoegg, U. R., Cigarette smoke in closed spaces, Environmental Health Perspectives, 3:117–128 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. The Health Consequences of Smoking, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmeltz, D., Hoffman, D., and Wynder, W. L., The influence of tobacco smoke on indoor atmospheres - 1. An overview. Preventive Medicine, 4:66–82 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawrence, C.E., Paulson, A.S. (1983). Cigarette Smoke : Cancer Risk at Low Doses. In: Covello, V.T., Flamm, W.G., Rodricks, J.V., Tardiff, R.G. (eds) The Analysis of Actual Versus Perceived Risks. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3760-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3760-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3762-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3760-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics