Skip to main content

Abstract

In many research fields it is possible to obtain good scientific results only after large amounts of data have been collected and analyzed; the analysis allows the researcher to detect regularities, similarities and discriminant features which may be useful to characterize different classes of objects. On the other hand, the manual examination of a large set of data is slow and error prone, so that many techniques have been proposed and are actually used to perform that analysis automatically (e.g. discriminant analysis); unfortunately, most of those techniques are based on mathematical methodologies which impose strong constraints on the kinds of data that can be analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Van Melle: “A Domain Independent Production Rule System for Consultation Program,” Proc. 6th IJCAI (Tokyo, 1979), pp. 923–925.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. M. Weiss, C. A. Kulikowski: “EXPERT: A System for Developing Consultation Models,” Proc. 6th IJCAI (Tokyo, 1979), pp. 942–947.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson: “Subjective Bayesian Methods for Rule Based Inference System,” SRI Tech. Report 124 (Menlo Park, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Ishizuka, K. S. Fu, J. T. Yao: “Inexact Inference for Rule Based Damage Assessment of Existing Structures,” Proc. 7th IJCAI (Vancouver, 1981), pp. 837–842.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. Barnett: “Computational Methods for a Mathematical Theory of Evidence,” Proc. 7th IJCAI (Vancouver, 1981), pp. 868–875.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. G. Dietterich, R. S. Michalski: “Inductive Learning of Structural Descriptions: Evaluation Criteria and Comparative Review of Selected Methods,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 16 (1981), pp. 257–294.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. S. Michalski: “Pattern Recognition as Rule Guided Inductive Inference,” IEEE Trans. on PAMI, vol. PAMI-2, (1980), pp. 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. A. Zadeh: “Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, (1978), pp. 3–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. L. A. Zadeh: “A Fuzzy Set Theoretic Interpretation of Linguistic Edges,” J. of Cybernetics, Vol. 2 (1972), pp. 4–34.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R. De Mori, L. Saitta: “Automatic Learning of Fuzzy Naming Relations over Finite Languages,” Information Sciences, Vol. 21 (1980), pp. 93–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Saitta, P. Torasso: “Fuzzy Characterization of Coronary Disease,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 5 (1981), pp. 245–258.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Lesmo, L. Saitta, P. Torasso: “Computer Aided Evaluation of Liver Functional Assessment,” Proc. 4th Annual Symp. on Computer Applications in Medical Care (Washington, 1980), pp. 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Lesmo, L. Saitta, P. Torasso: “Learning of Fuzzy Production Rules for Medical Diagnosis,” in ’Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis,’ M. Gupta and E. Sanchez, Ed.s, North-Holland Publ. Co. (1982), pp. 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Lesmo, M. Marzuoli, G. Molino, P. Torasso: “An Expert System for the Evaluation of Liver Functional Assessment,” Proc. First Annual Conference of American Association for Medical Systems and Informatics (Washington, D.C., 1982), pp. 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lesmo, L., Saitta, L., Torasso, P. (1983). Fuzzy Production Rules: A Learning Methodology. In: Wang, P.P. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Sets, Possibility Theory, and Applications. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3754-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3754-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3756-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3754-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics