Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environmental Science Research ((ESRH,volume 28))

Abstract

In extrapolating animal data to humans, in order to attempt to estimate genetic hazards, there are several separate types of extrapolation which have to be made (1) from experimental to environmental dose levels, (2) from one cell type to another, e.g., from somatic to germ cells, or from male to female germ cells, (3) from one species to another, and (4) from estimated mutation rates to cases of genetic disease in man.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Ehrenberg, E. Moustacchi, and S. Osterman-Golkar, Dosimetry of genotoxic agents and dose response relationships of their effects, Mutation Res. (in press) (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Ehrenberg, in: “Banbury Report. I. Assessing Chemical Mutagens: the Risk to Humans,” V. K. McElheny and S. Abrahamson, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, pp. 152–190 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Ehrenberg and S. Osterman-Golkar, Alkylation of macromolecules for detecting mutagenic agents, Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis, and Mutagenesis, 1:105–127 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. R. Lee, in: “Chemical Mutagens,” A. Hollaender and F. de Serres, eds., Vol. 5, Chap. 8, Dosimetry of chemical mutagens in eukaryotic germ cells, pp. 177–202 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. R. Lee, in: “Banbury Report. I. Assessing Chemical Mutagens: the Risk to Humans,” V. K. McElheny and S. Abrahamson, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, pp. 191–200 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. P. Perera and I. B. Weinstein, Molecular epidemiology and carcinogen-DNA adduct detection: new approaches to studies of human cancer causation, J. Chronic Diseases (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. F. Lyon, Sensitivity of various germ cell stages to environmental mutagens, Mutation Res., 87:323–345 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. L. Russell, This symposium (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. F Lyon and B. D. Cox, The induction by X-rays of chromosome aberrations in male guinea-pigs, rabbits, and golden hamsters. III. Dose-response relationships after single doses of X-rays to spermatogonia, Mutation Res., 29:407–422 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. G. Brewen, J. R. Preston, and N. Gengozian, Analysis of X-ray-induced chromosomal translocations in human and marmoset spermatogonial stem cells, Nature, 253:468–470 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. F. Lyon, B. D. Cox, and J. H. Marston, Dose-response data for X-ray induced translocations in spermatogonia of rhesus monkeys, Mutation Res., 35:429–436 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. P. W. van Buul, Dose-response relationship for X-ray induced reciprocal translocations in stem cell spermatogonia of the Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta), Mutation Res., 73:363–375 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. A. Bridges, An approach to the assessment of the risk to man from DNA damaging agents, Arch. Toxicol. Suppl. 3, 271–281 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. H. Sobels, in: “Progress in Mutation Research,” Elsevier/ North Holland, Amsterdam, The parallelogram: an indirect apprach for the assessment of genetic risks from chemical mutagens, Vol. 3, pp. 323–327 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Streisinger, Extrapolation from species to species and from various cell types in assessing risks from chemical mutagens, Mutation Res., 114:93–105 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. V. Mailing, This symposium (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. A. Ansari, M. A. Baig, J. G. Burkhart, and H. V. Mailing, Detection of presumptive point mutation in sperm from mice treated with procarbazine and mitomycin C, Genetics, 94:s3 (1980a).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. A. Ansari, M. A. Baig, and H. V. Mailing, In vivo germinal mutation detection with “monospecific” antibody against lactate dehydrogenase-X, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 77:7352–7356 (1980b).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Rudak, P. A. Jacobs, and R. Yanagimachi, Direct analysis of the chromosome constitution of human spermatozoa, Nature, 274:911–913 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. BEIR, The Effects on Populations of Exposures to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Oftedal and A. G. Searle, An overall genetic risk assessment for radiological protection purposes, J. Med. Genet., 17:15–20 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. UNSCEAR, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations, New York (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. L. Russell, Comments on mutagenesis risk estimation, Genetics, 92:sl87-sl94 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  24. U. H. Ehling, Strahlengenetisches Risiko des Menschen, UMSCHAU, 80:754–759 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. U. H. Ehling, J. Favor, J. Kratochvilova, and A. Neuhauser Klaus, Dominant cataract mutations and specific-locus mutations in mice induced by radiation or ethylnitrosourea, Mutation Res., 92:181–192 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. V. A. McKusick, Mendelian Inheritance in Man, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 5th edition (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Kirk and M. F. Lyon, Induction of congenital anomalies in offspring of female mice exposed to varying doses of X-rays, Mutation Res., 106:73–83 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F. Vogel, Approaches to an evaluation of the genetic load due to mutagenic agents in the human population, Mutation Res., 29:263–269 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. F. Vogel and P. Jager, The genetic load of a human population due to cytostatic agents, Humangenetik, 7:287–304 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C. O. Carter, Monogenic disorders, J. Med. Genet., 14:316–320 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. I. Leek, Congenital malformations and childhood neoplasms, J. Med. Genet., 14:321–326 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. H. J. Evans, Chromosome anomalies among livebirths, J. Med. Genet., 14:309–312 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A. G. Searle, Mutation induction in mice, Adv. Radiation Biol., 4:131–207 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. W. Au and T. C. Hsu, The genotoxic effects of adriamycin in somatic and germinal cells of the mouse, Mutation Res., 79: 351–361 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A. J. Wyrobek and W. R. Bruce, in: “Chemical Mutagens. Principles and Methods for Their Detection,” A. Hollaender and F. J. de Serres, eds., Vol. 5, Chaper 11. The induction of sperm-shape abnormalities in mice and humans, pp. 257–285, Plenum Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  36. U. H. Ehling, in: “Chemical Mutagens,” A. Hollaender, ed., Vol. 5, pp. 233–256, Specific locus mutations in mice, Plenum Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  37. W. M. Generoso, J. B. Bishop, D. G. Gosslee, G. W. Newell, C. J. Sheu, and E. von Halle, Heritable translocation test in mice, Mutation Res., 76:191–215 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  38. U. H. Ehling, Induction of gene mutations in germ cells of the mouse, Arch. Toxicol., 46:123–138 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. U. H. Ehling and A. Neuhauser, Procarbazine-induced specific locus mutation in male mice, Mutation Res., 59:245–256 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. R. K. Sharma, G. T. Roberts, F. M. Johnson, and H. V. Mailing, Translocation and sperm abnormality assays in mouse spermatogonia treated with procarbazine, Mutation Res., 67:385–388 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. A. M. Malashenko and N. I. Surkova, The mutagenic effect of thio-TEPA in laboratory mice. I. Chromosome aberrations in somatic and germ cells of male mice, Soviet Genetics, 10:51–58 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Wade, Martindale. The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 27th edition, Pharmaceutical Press, London (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lyon, M.F. (1983). Problems in Extrapolation of Animal Data to Humans. In: de Serres, F.J., Sheridan, W. (eds) Utilization of Mammalian Specific Locus Studies in Hazard Evaluation and Estimation of Genetic Risk. Environmental Science Research, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3739-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3739-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3741-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3739-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics