Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environmental Science Research ((ESRH,volume 28))

Abstract

A cataract is an opacity of the lens causing a reduction of visual function [1]. The organogenesis of the lens in various mammals is similar [2], Therefore, a gene, which disturbs in different species the same process of the normal development of the lens, leads to the manifestation of the same cataract type in these different species. Ehling [3] pointed out that morphologically comparable cataracts in humans and mammals have very often the same mode of inheritance. Marner [4] described in humans the transmission of a zonular cataract through 8 generations. A similar cataract with dominant inheritance was described for dogs [5, 6], rabbits [7], and rats [8]. These examples may be sufficient to emphasize that cataract mutations observed in the mouse can be directly compared with the manifestation of cataracts in man.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Francois, Congenital Cataracts, Royal VanGorcum Ltd., Assen, Netherlands (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. von Hippel, Die Mißbildungen des Auges, in: Die Morphologie der Mißbildungen des Menschen und der Tiere, E. Schwalbe, ed., Teil III, 1. Lieferung, pp. 1–66, Gustav Fischer, Jena (1909).

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Ehling, Vererbung von Augenleiden im Tierreich, 65. Bericht Dtsch. Opthm. Ges. Heidelberg 1963, pp. 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Marner, A family with eight generations of hereditary cataract, Acta Opthalm., 27:537–551 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Westhues, Der Schichtstar des Hundes, Arch. Tierheilk., 54: 32–83 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. von Hippel, Embryologische Untersuchungen über Vererbung angeborener Katarakt, über Schichtstar des Hundes sowie über eine besondere Form von Kapselkatarakt, Graefes Arch. für Ophthalmologie, 124:300–324 (1930).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. U. Ehling, Untersuchungen zur kausalen Genese erblicher Katarakte beim Kaninchen, Z. menschl. Vererb.- und Konstitutions lehre, 34:77–104 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. E. Smith and B. F. Barrentine, Hereditary cataract, A new dominant gene in the rat, J. Hered., 34:8–10 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. H. Ehling, Dominant mutations affecting the skeleton in offspring of x-irradiated male mice, Genetics, 54:1381–1389 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. S. Selby, Induced skeletal mutations, Genetics, 92:s127–s133 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kratochvilova and U. H. Ehling, Dominant cataract mutations induced by γ-irradiation of male mice, Mutation Res., 63:221–223 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. U. H. Ehling, J. Favor, J. Kratochvilova, and A. Neuhäuser-Klaus, Dominant cataract mutations and specific-locus mutations in mice induced by radiation or ethylnitrosourea, Mutation Res., 92:181–192 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. U. H. Ehling, Die Gefährdung der menschlichen Erbanlagen im technischen Zeitalter, Fortsch. Röntgenstr., 124:166–171 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. U. H. Ehling, Estimation of the frequency of radiation-induced dominant mutations, ICRP, CI-TG14, Task Group on Genetically Determined Ill-Health (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. U. H. Ehling, Risk estimations based on germ-cell mutations in mice, in: “Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental Mutagens, T. Sugimura, S. Kondo, and H. Takebe, eds., pp. 709–719, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo/Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. A. McKusick, Mendelian Inheritance in Man, 5th Edition, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore-London (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. U. H. Ehling, Strahlengenetisches Risiko des Menschen, Umschau, 80:754–759 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Kratochvilova, Dominant cataract mutations detected in offspring of gamma-irradiated male mice, J. Hered., 72:302–307 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Favor, ENU-induced dominant cataract mutations in mice, 13th Annual Meeting of the Environmental Mutagen Society (USA), Boston, Massachusettes, 25.2–2.3.1982, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Favor, The penetrance value tested of a presumed dominant mutation heterozygote in a genetic confirmation test for a given number of offspring observed, Mutation Res., 92:192 (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. L. Crow and R. S. Gardner, Confidence intervals for the expectation of a poisson variable, Biometrika, 46:441–453 (1959).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. M. L. Watson, Blind - a dominant mutation in mice, J. Hered., 59:60–64 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. G. Tissot and C. Cohen, A new congenital cataract in the mouse, J. Hered., 63:197–201 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. E. Paget, Cataracta hereditaria subcapsularis: Ein neues, dominantes Allel bei der Hausmaus, Z. Indukt. Abstamm. Vererbungsl., 85:238–244 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. C. Verrusio and F. C. Fraser, Identity of mutant genes “Shrivelled” and cataracta congenita subcapsularis in the mouse, Genet. Res., Camb., 8:377–378 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B.V. Konyukhov and N. A. Kolesova, A study of effects of the mutant gene CATFr single dose in ontogenesis of mice, Ontogenesis, Academy of Sciences, USSR, 12:298–305 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Hatara, R. Shoji, and R. Semba, Genetic background and expressivity of congenital cataract in mice, Japan. J. Genetics, 53:147–152 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Theiler, D. S. Varnum, and L. C. Stevens, Development of Dickie’s small eye, a mutation in the house mouse, Anat. Embryol., 155:81–86 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Oda, T. Watanabe, and K. Kondo, A new mutation, eye lens obsolesence, Elo on chromosome 1 in the mouse, Japan. J. Genetics, 55:71–75 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. S. Gower, Research communication, Mouse Newslett., 8:14 (Suppl.) (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. F. Lyon, S. E. Jarvis, I. Sayers, and R. S. Holmes, Lens opacity: a new gene for congenital cataract on chromosome 10 of the mouse, Genet. Res., Camb., 38:337–341 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mouse News Letter, No. 65, July 1981, A. G. Searle, ed., M. R. C. Laboratories, Carshalton, England.

    Google Scholar 

  34. U. H. Ehling, Specific-locus mutations in mice, in: “Chemical Mutagens,” A. Hollaender and F. J. de Serres, eds., Vol. 5,” pp. 233–256, Plenum Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. B. Russell, P. B. Selby, E. von Halle, W. Sheridan, and L. Valcovic, The mouse specific-locus test with agents other than radiations, Interpretation of data and recommendations for future work, Mutation Res., 86:329–354 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  36. U. H. Ehling, In vivo gene mutations in mammals, Proc. of the Symposium “Critical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Tests,” Bundesgesundheit samt, Berlin, 22.–25.2.1982, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. J. Muller, Radiation damage to the genetic material, Am. Sci., 38:33–59 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. F. Lyon, D. G. Papworth, and R. J. S. Phillips, Dose-rate and mutation frequency after irradiation of mouse spermatogonia, Nature, 238:101–104 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. W. L. Russell, Studies in mammalian radiation genetics, Nucleonics, 23:53–56, 62 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Favor, A. Neuhäuser-Klaus, and U. H. Ehling, A comparison of ENU induced dominant cataracts and recessive mutations in spermatogonia of mice, 12th Annual Meeting of the European Environmental Mutagen Society, Dipoli, Espoo, Finland, 20.–24.6. 1982, p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  41. U. H. Ehling and A. Neuhäuser, Procarbazine-induced specific- locus mutations in male mice, Mutation Res., 59:245–256 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. W. L. Russell, L. B. Russell, and E. F. Oakberg, Radiation genetics of mammals, in: “Radiation Biology and Medicine,” W. D. Claus, ed., pp. 189–205, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., USA (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  43. U. H. Ehling, Induction of gene mutations in germ cells of the mouse, Arch. Toxicol., 46:123–138 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  44. UNSCEAR-Report (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation), Supplement No. 14, United Nations, New York (1966) (Quotation page 8).

    Google Scholar 

  45. BEIR-Report (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations), The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: 1980, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1980) (Quotation page 82).

    Google Scholar 

  46. K. Sankaranarayanan, Genetic Effects of Ionizing Radiation in Multicellular Eukaryotes and the Assessment of Genetic Radiation Hazards in Man, Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  47. W. L. Russell, Mutation frequencies in female mice and the estimation of genetic hazards of radiation in women, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74:3523–3527 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Abrahamson, M. A. Bender, A. D. Conger, and S. Wolff, Uniformity of radiation-induced mutation rates among different species, Nature, 245:460–462 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. UNSCEAR-Report (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation), Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations, New York (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  50. W. Jacobi, H. G. Paretzke, and U. H. Ehling, Strahlenexposition und Strahlenrisiko der Bevölkerung, GSF-Bericht S-710, Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung, Neuherberg (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  51. U. H. Ehling, Evaluation of presumed dominant skeletal mutations, in: “Chemical Mutagenesis in Mammals and Man,” F. Vogel and G. Röhrborn, eds., pp. 162–166, Springer-Verlag, Berlin- Heidelberg-New York (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  52. K. S. Brown, R. E. Cranley, R. Greene, H. K. Kleinman, and J. P. Pennypacker, Disproportionate micromelia (Dmm): an incomplete dominant mouse dwarfism with abnormal cartilage matrix, J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 62:165–182 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  53. H. B. Newcombe, Mutation and the amount of human ill health, in: “Radiation Research — Biomedical, Chemical, and Physical Perspectives,” Proc. 5th Intern. Congr. Rad. Res. 1974, O. F. Nygaard, H. I. Adler, and W. R. Sinclair, eds., pp. 937–946, Academic Press, New York-San Francisco-London (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  54. W. Pretsch, D. J. Charles, and J. Kratochvilova, Untersuchungen an Linsenextrakten von Mäusen mit erblicher Katarakt: Ultradünnschicht-isoelektrische Fokussierung und Enzymanalysen, in: “Elektrophorese Formum ’80,” B. J. Radola, ed., pp. 75–80, Technische Universität München (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ehling, U.H. (1983). Cataracts — Indicators for Dominant Mutations in Mice and Man. In: de Serres, F.J., Sheridan, W. (eds) Utilization of Mammalian Specific Locus Studies in Hazard Evaluation and Estimation of Genetic Risk. Environmental Science Research, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3739-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3739-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3741-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3739-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics