Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data ((RPQN,volume 2A))

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

The damage tolerance approach to structural safety is based on the predicted growth of the “largest” crack that could be present in a structure at the start of a usage period1–4. The length, aNDE of this potential crack has generally been determined by correlating crack size with the reliability of the non-destructive evaluation (NDE) system employed during structural inspections. Since many factors other than crack length influence detectability, NDE reliability as a function of crack length must be expressed as a probability of detection (POD) and must be estimated from a demonstration experiment whose results are non-deterministic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. “Aircraft Structural Integrity Program, Airplane Requirements,” Military Standard MIL-STD-1530A, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “Airplane Damage Tolerance Requirements,” Military Specifications MIL-A-83444, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher, J. P., Grandt, A. F., Jr., and Crane, R. L., Journal Of Aircraft, Vol. 15, July 1978, pp. 435–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coffin, M. D. and Tiffany, C. F., Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 13, February 1976, pp. 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wood, H. A. and Engle, R. M., Jr., “USAF Damage Tolerant Design Handbook: Guidelines for the Analysis and Design of Damage Tolerant Aircraft,” AFFDL-TR-79-3021, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, March, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Packman, P. F., Klima, S. J., Davies, R. L., Malpani, J., Moyzis, J., Walker, W., Yee, B. G. W., and Johnson, D. P., “Reliability of Flaw Detection by Nondestructive Inspection,” ASM Metal Handbook, Vol. 11, 8th Edition, Metals Park, Ohio, pp. 214–224, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yee, B. G. W., Chang, F. H., Couchman, J. C., Lemon, G. H., and Packman, P. F., “Assessment of NDE Reliability Data,” NASA CR-134991, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, W. H., Dodd, B. D., Sproat, W. H., and Hamilton, J. M., Reliability of Nondestructive Inspections — “Final Report,” Report No. SA-ALC/MEE 76-6-38-1, United States Air Force, San Antonio Air Logistics Center, Kelly Air Force Base, Texas, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berens, A. P. and Hovey, P. W., “Evaluation of NDE Reliability Characterization,” AFWAL-TR-81-4160, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, November, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berens, A.P., Hovey, P.W. (1983). Evaluating POD/CL Characterizations of NDE Reliability. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, vol 2A. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3706-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3706-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3708-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3706-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics