Cure Monitoring of Thermosetting Polymers by an Ultrasonic Technique

  • Donald L. Hunston
Part of the Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data book series (volume 2A)

Abstract

In the fabrication of components with thermosetting polymers, an essential step is the proper optimization of the cure cycle. In the early phases of the cure the polymer must have the appropriate flow properties to assure the proper wetting, spreading, and forming. It must then harden without excessive build up of residual stresses and flaws or the loss of adhesion at any interfaces that are present. To complicate the situation further, many applications such as composites, adhesives, paints, and protective coatings involve thin films whose cure behavior is significantly different than that for bulk samples. To help address this problem, an ultrasonic shear wave propagation technique has been developed. It is a laboratory device that measures the dynamic shear properties of a thin film in a way which is both nondestructive and nonperturbing to any chemical reactions that may be occurring. The applicability of this test method was demonstrated with cure studies on two model systems: one based on tung oil the other based on an epoxy resin.

Keywords

Attenuation Mold Epoxy Rubber Shrinkage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.J. Barlow, G. Harrison, J. Richter, H. Sequin and J. Lamb, Electrical Methods for the Viscoelastic Behavior of Liquids under Cyclic Shearing Stress, Lab. Pract., 10, 786, 1961.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.P. Mason, W.O. Baker, H.J. McSkimin and J.H. Heiss, Measurement of Shear Elasticity and Viscosity of Liquids at Ultrasonic Frequencies, Physical Review, 75, 936, 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.J. Knauss, D. Leppo and R.R. Myers, Viscoelastic Measurement of Polybutenes and Low Viscosity Liquids Using Ultrasonic Strip Delay Lines, J. Polym. Sci., Symposium No. 43, 179, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.L. Huriston, R.R. Meyrs arid M.B. Palmer, A. Layered Waveguide Technique for Determination of the Viscoelastic Properties of Liquids and Deformabel Solids, Trans. Soc. Rheol., 16, 33, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.L. Hunston, C.J. Knauss, M.B. Palmer and R.R. Myers, Viscoelastic Measurements of Poly(dimethylsiloxanes) and Polystyrene Solution Using the Layered Waveguide Technique, Trans. Soc. Rheol., 16, 45, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.L. Hunston, Determination of Viscoelastic Constants for Polymers Using Non-Dispersive Strip Delay Lines, Ph.D. Dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 1969,Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Koh, An Ultrasonic Method for Measurement of Viscoelastic Properties of Polymeric Solutions, Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T.R. Meeker and A.H. Meitzler, Guided Wave Propagation in Elongated Cylinders and Plates, in “Physical Acoustics,” Vol. 1, W.P. Mason, ed., Academic Press, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.E. May, Jr., Precise Measurement of Time Delay, I.R.E. Convention Rec., 6, Part 2, 134, 1958.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.P. Papadakis, Ultrasonic Phase Velocity by the Pulse-Echo- Overlap Method Incorporating Diffraction Phase Corrections, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 42, 1045, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.L. Hunston, J.L. Rushford, W.R. Newitt and B.A. Vaudreuil, Rheology of Cure for Intaglio Printing Inks, Organic Coatings and Plastics Preprints, 47, 513, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.K. Banthia, I. Yilgor, J.E. McGrath and G. Wilkes, Bis-Methacryloxy Bisphenol-A Epoxy Networks, Polymer Preprints, 22, (1), 209, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald L. Hunston
    • 1
  1. 1.Polymer DivisionNational Bureau of StandardsUSA

Personalised recommendations