Abstract
It has now been 16 years since Fairfield and Cahill (1966) and Rostoker and Fälthammar (1967) provided convincing evidence that, as predicted by Dungey (1961), the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) modulated the transfer of energy from the solar wind to the magnetosphere. In particular, it was evident that the transfer function for the solar-terrestrial interaction was dependent on the direction of the IMF with respect to magnetopause field lines and, to some extent on the solar wind velocity. Rostoker and Fälthammar (1967) suggested that the component of the interplanetary electric field in the ecliptic plane and normal to the sun-earth line (Eϕ = -vsBz where Vs is the solar wind velocity and Bz the component of the IMF parallel or antiparallel to magnetopause field lines) was the best quantitative indicator of the energy transfer and even at the present time it is favored by some researchers dealing with the solar-terrestrial interaction (e.g. Clauer, 1981). In recent years several researchers have attempted to utilize various combinations of solar wind parameters to predict magnetospheric activity levels (as quantified using ap and AE by Garrett (1973) and using AE by Murayama and Hakamada (1975) amongst others).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S.-I. Akasofu, Interplanetary energy flux associated with magnetospheric storms, Planet. Space Sci., 27: 425 (1979).
S.-I. Akasofu, Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 28: 21 (1981a).
S.-I. Akasofu, Magnetospheric substorms: a newly emerging model, Planet. Space Sci., 29: 1069 (1981b).
M. N. Caan, Interplanetary magnetic field changes and the magnetotail, in: “Dynamics of the Magnetosphere”, S.-I. Akasofu, ed., D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht-Holland (1979).
M. N. Caan, R. L. McPherron and C. T. Russell, Characteristics of the association between the interplanetary magnetic field and substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 82: 4837 (1977).
A. J. Chen, Penetration of low-energy protons deep into the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 75: 2458 (1970).
C. R. Clauer, Solar wind control of auroral zone geomagnetic activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8: 915 (1981).
W. Dungey, Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zones, Phys. Rev. Lett., 6: 47 (1961).
D.H. Fairfield and L. J. Cahill, Transition region magnetic field and polar magnetic disturbances, J. Geophys. Res., 71: 155 (1966).
H. B. Garrett, The influence of the variance of the interplanetary magnetic field on geomagnetic activity, Ph.D. Thesis, Rice University (1973).
A. Hasegawa and T. Sato, Generation of field-aligned current during substorm, in “Dynamics of the Magneto-spherell, S.-I. Akasofu, ed., D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht-Holland (1979).
T. J. Hughes and G. Rostoker, A comprehensive model current system for high latitude magnetic activity. I. The steady state system, Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc., 58: 525 (1979).
T. Iijima and T. A. Potemra, The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by Triad, J. Geophys. Res., 81: 2165 (1976).
K. Kawasaki, S.-I. Akasofu, F. Yasuhara and C.-I. Meng, Storm sudden commencements and polar magnetic sub-storms, J. Geophys. Res., 76: 6781 (1971).
R. L. McPherron, Substorm related changes in the geomagnetic tail: the growth phase, Planet. Space Sci., 20: 1521 (1972).
F. S. Mozer, C. A. Cattell, M. K. Hudson, R. L. Lysak, M. Temerin and R. B. Torbert, Satellite measurements and theories of low altitude auroral particle acceleration, Space Sci. Rev., 27: 155 (1980).
T. Murayama and K. Hakamada, Effects of solar wind parameters on the development of magnetospheric substorms, Planet. Space Sci., 23: 75 (1975).
T. Pytte, R. L. McPherron, E. W. Hones, Jr. and H. I. West, Jr., Multiple satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms: distinction between polar magnetic substorms and convection-driven negative bays, J. Geophys. Res., 83: 663 (1978).
G. Rostoker, Magnetospheric and ionospheric currents in the polar cusp and the dependence on the By component of the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 85: 4167 (1980).
G. Rostoker and C.-G. Falthammar, Relationship between changes in the interplanetary magnetic field and variations in the magnetic field at the Earth’s surface, J. Geophys. Res., 72: 5853 (1967).
G. Rostoker, H.-L. Lam and W. D. Hume, Response time of the magnetosphere to the interplanetary electric field, Can. J. Phys., 50: 544 (1972).
G. Rostoker and R. Bostrom, A mechanism for driving the gross Birkeland current configuration in the auroral oval, J. Geophys. Res., 81: 235 (1976).
G. Rostoker, M. Mareschal and J. C. Samson, Response of dayside net downward field-aligned current to changes in the interplanetary magnetic field and to substorn perturbations, J. Geophys. Res. (in press 1982).
N. A. Saflekos, T. A. Potemra, P. M. Kintner, Jr. and J. L. Green, Field-aligned currents, convection, electric fields and ULF-VLF waves in the cusp, J. Geophys. Res., 84: 1391 (1979).
T. Sato, Possible sources of field-aligned currents, Rep. Ionos. Space Res. Japan, 28: 179 (1974).
J. Wilhjelm, E. Friis-Christensen and T. A. Potemra, The relationship between ionospheric and field-aligned currents in the dayside cusp, J. Geophys. Res., 83: 5586 (1978).
A. J. Zmuda, F. T. Heuring and J. H. Martin, Dayside magnetic disturbances at 1100 kilometers in the auroral oval, J. Geophys. Res., 72: 1115 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rostoker, G. (1983). Dependence of the High-Latitude Ionospheric Fields and Plasma Characteristics on the Properties of the Interplanetary Medium. In: Hultqvist, B., Hagfors, T. (eds) High-Latitude Space Plasma Physics. Nobel Foundation Symposia Published by Plenum, vol 54. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3652-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3652-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3654-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3652-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive