On the Strictly Complementary Slackness Relation in Linear Programming

  • Shuzhong Zhang
Part of the Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications book series (NOIA, volume 1)

Abstract

Balinski and Tucker introduced in 1969 a special form of optimal tableaus for LP, which can be used to construct primal and dual optimal solutions such that the complementary slackness relation holds strictly. In this paper, first we note that using a polynomial time algorithm for LP Balinski and Tucker’s tableaus are obtainable in polynomial time. Furthermore, we show that, given a pair of primal and dual optimal solutions satisfying the complementary slackness relation strictly, it is possible to find a Balinski and Tucker’s optimal tableau in strongly polynomial time. This establishes the equivalence between Balinski and Tucker’s format of optimal tableaus and a pair of primal and dual solutions to satisfy the complementary slackness relation strictly. The new algorithm is related to Megiddo’s strongly polynomial algorithm that finds an optimal tableau based on a pair of primal and dual optimal solutions.

Keywords

Lution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.L. Balinski and A.W. Tucker, Duality theory of linear programming: A constructive approach with applications, SI AM Review 11 (1969) 347–377.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Chvatal, Linear Programming, W.H. FYeeman and Company, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.B. Dantzig, Linear Programming and Extensions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1963.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.J. Goldman and A.W. Tucker, Theory of linear programming, in Linear Inequalities and Related Systems (H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker eds.), Annuals of Mathematical Studies, No. 38, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1956.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Güller, C. Roos, T. Terlaky and J.-Ph. Vial, Interior point approach to the theory of linear programming, Technical Report No. 1992. 3, Université de Genève, Switerland.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Jansen, C. Roos, T. Terlaky and J.-Ph. Vial, Interior-point methodology for linear programming: Duality, sensitivity analysis and computational aspects, Report 93–28, Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Informatics, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.O. Kortanek and J. Zhu, New purification algorithms for linear programming, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 35 (1988) 571–583.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Megiddo, On finding primal— and dual optimal bases, ORSA Journal on Computing 3 (1991) 63–65.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Schrijver, Theory of Linear and Integer Programming, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Terlaky, A convergent criss-cross method, Math. Oper. und Stat., ser. Optimization 16 (1985) 683–690.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Terlaky find S. Zhang, Pivoting rules for linear programming: A survey on recent theoretical developments, to appear in Annuals of Operations Research: Special Volume on Degeneracy Problems Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Zhang and S. Zhang, Convex exact penalty functions, space dilation and linear programming, Research Memorandum Nr. 524, Institute of Economics Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuzhong Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Econometric InstituteErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations