Abstract
Until fairly recently, in the West, the supremacy of the father in the home was taken for granted. Even though philosophers as far apart historically as John Locke and Karl Marx had protested against the abuses of paternal authoritarianism (Marx in particular calling for the total elimination of the patriarchal, bourgeois family), it has not been until this century that patriarchal thinking seems to have been fatally undermined. Today the role of the father has changed to such an extent that the question of who ought to be considered the highest authority in the nuclear family may be considered open. Gregory Bateson in fact asserts candidly that “the American family is a unit with imperfectly defined leadership and a spectrum of opinions. Neither parent is in a position of recognized final authority.” Indeed, he continues, the “outstanding parent” in a given family
…must overtly act as though he or she were orchestrating a diversity of opinions—and must perform this function not with a silent baton, but playing actually in the orchestra, exerting an integrating influence only by his or her contribution to the total sequence of sound (Bateson and Ruesch, p. 162).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bateson, G., and Ruesch, J. Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: Norton, 1968; Orig. ed. 1951.
Bateson, G. Steps to an ecology of the mind. New York: Ballantine, 1975. Orig. ed. 1972.
Bennis, W. G., and Slater, P. E. The temporary society. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
Erickson, E. Childhood and society, 2nd rev. ed. New York: Norton, 1963.
Horkheimer, M. Authoritarianism and the family. In R. Nanda Anshen (Ed.), The family: Its function and destiny. New York: Harper, 1959. Orig. ed. 1949.
Laing, R. D. Sanity, madness and the family, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books, 1971. Orig. ed. 1964.
Lasch, C. Haven in the heartless world. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
Lewis, J. M., Beaver, W. R., Gossett, 3. T., and Phillips, V. A. (Eds.) No single thread: Psychological health in family systems. New York: Brunner-Mazel, 1976.
Locke, J. Two treatise of civil government. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1924.
Minuchin, S., and Minuchin, P. The child in context: A systems approach to growth and treatment. In N. B. Talbot (Ed.), Raising children in modern America. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1974.
Popper, K. The open society and its enemies, 4th rev. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966. Orig. ed. 1945.
Porteous, H. Sex and identity. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs- Merrill, 1972.
Satir, V. People making. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books, 1972.
Sorokin, P. A. Social and cultural dynamics, 4 Vols. New York: Bed- minster Press, 1962. Orig. ed. 1937.
Stone, L. The family, sex and marriage in England, 1500–1800 New York: Harper and Row, 1977.
Wilczak, P. F. Indwelling as a method of family research and therapy: A perspective on the human suggested by the thought of Michael Polanyi. Zygon, 1975, 10, 175–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Struckmeyer, F.R. (1982). Authority and the Family: Some Considerations. In: Cafagna, A.C., Peterson, R.T., Staudenbaur, C.A. (eds) Philosophy, Children, and the Family. Child Nurturance, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3473-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3473-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3475-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3473-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive