Consultation for Self-Evaluation

Social Climate Assessment as a Catalyst for Programmatic Change in Mental Health Treatment Environments
  • Steven Friedman

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to illustrate the use of social climate assessment techniques within a consultation framework. The goal of such consultation to mental health treatment settings is to facilitate self-evaluation and programmatic changes on the part of the existing staff. The consultant educates the staff on the use of social climate assessment techniques that are highly economical, efficient, valuable to line staff, and incorporate clients’ contributions.

Keywords

Schizophrenia Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Friedman, S., Jeger, A. M., & Slotnick, R. S. Psychosocial climate of a psychiatric ward: Differential perceptions of nursing personnel and other professionals. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1980, 5, 613–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gripp, R. F., & Magaro, P. A. A token economy program evaluation with untreated control ward comparison. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1971, 9, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jeger, A. M., & McClure, G. Evaluation of a behavioral consultation program: Changes in consultees, clients, and the social environment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, April 1979.Google Scholar
  4. Kish, G. B. Evaluation of ward atmosphere. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1971, 22, 159–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kohn, M., Jeger, A. M., & Koretzky, M. B. Social-ecological assessment of environments: Toward a two-factor model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1979, 7, 481–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Milby, J. B., Pendergrass, P. E., & Clark, C. J. Token economy versus control ward: A comparison of staff and patient attitudes toward ward environment. Behavior Therapy, 1975, 6, 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moos, R. H. Changing the social milieus of psychiatric treatment settings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 9, 575–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moos, R. H. Evaluating treatment environments: A social ecological approach. New York: Wiley, 1974. (a)Google Scholar
  9. Moos, R. H. Ward atmosphere scale manual. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1974. (b)Google Scholar
  10. Moos, R. H. Community-oriented programs environment scale manual. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1974. (c)Google Scholar
  11. Moos, R. H., & Houts, P. S. The assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1968, 73, 595–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moos, R. H., & Houts, P. Differential effects of the social atmosphere of psychiatric wards. Human Relations, 1970, 23, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moos, R. H., & Schwartz, J. Treatment environment and treatment outcome. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1972, 154, 264–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mosher, L. R., Menn, A., & Matthews, S. M. Soteria: Evaluation of a home-based treatment for schizophrenia. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1975, 45, 455–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pierce, W. D., Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. Changing ward atmosphere through staff discussion of the perceived ward environment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1972, 26, 35–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Price, R. H., & Moos, R. H. Toward a taxonomy of inpatient treatment environments. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1975, 84, 181–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verinis, J. S., & Flaherty, J. A. Using the ward atmosphere scale to help change the treatment environment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1978, 29, 238–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Friedman
    • 1
  1. 1.Downstate Medical CenterBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations