Evaluating Simulator Validity

  • Jan Moraal
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 17)


Simulators are means and no ends in themselves, at least not for those who use them for the study of human behaviour or, for training people on the required skills in complex man-machine systems. By definition, simulation is never complete, otherwise it would result in a perfect copy of the real system.


Training Time Training Simulator Lateral Control Longitudinal Control Functional Correspondence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blaauw, G.J., Horst, A.R.A. van der and Godthelp, J., 1978, The vehicle simulator of the Institute for Perception: a validation study of straight road driving (in Dutch), Institute for Perception TNO, Progress Report I: IZF 1978 - 16, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  2. Blaauw, G.J., 1980, Driving experience and task demands in simulator and instrumented car: a validation study, Institute for Perception TNO, Progress Report II: IZF 1980 - 9, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. Cronbach, L.J., 1960, “Essentials of Psychological Testing”, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Institute for Perception TNO, 1978, A Large-Scale Simulation System for the Study of Navigation and Driving Behaviour, TNO Documentation sheet 39e, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. McLane, R.C. and Wierwille, W.W., 1975, The influence of motion and audio cues on driver performance in an automobile simulator, Human Factors, 17 (5), 448–501.Google Scholar
  6. McRuer, D.T. and Krendel, E.S., 1974, Mathematical models of human pilot behaviour, AGARD Meeting AG-188, NATO, Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. McRuer, D.T. and Klein, R.H., 1976, Comparison of human driver dynamics in an automobile on the road with those in simulators having complex and simple visual displays, Paper 173A, presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. McRuer, D.T., Wade Allen, R., Weir, D.H. and Klein, R.H., 1977, New results in driver steering control models, Human Factors, 19 (4) 381–397.Google Scholar
  9. Moraal, J. and Poll, K.J., 1979, The Link-Miles driver training simulator for tracked vehicles; a validation study (in Dutch), Institute for Perception TNO, report nr. IZF 1979-23, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Mudd, S., 1968, Assessment of the fidelity of dynamic flight simulators, Human Factors, 10 (4), 351–358.Google Scholar
  11. Sanders, A.F., 1976, Experimental Methods in Human Engineering, in: “Introduction to Human Engineering”, K.F. Kraiss and J. Moraal (eds.), Verlag TÜV Rheinland GmbH, Köln.Google Scholar
  12. Truijens, C.L., 1978, The validity of marine simulators, in: “Proceedings of the First International Conference of Human Factors in the Design and Operation of Ships”, D. Anderson et al. (eds.), Gothenburg, 463–476.Google Scholar
  13. Truijens, C.L. and Schuffei, H., 1978, Ergonomie Research “Open Hartelkanaal”, Part III: The validity of the simulation of pushing convoy navigation in the Härtel area (in Dutch), Institute for Perception TNO, report nr. IZF 1978-C6, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Moraal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations