Abstract
Applications such as robot programming, design for manufacturing, animation of digital actors, rationale drug design, and surgical planning, require computing paths in high-dimensional geometric spaces, a provably hard problem. Recently, a general path-planning approach based on a parallelizable random sampling scheme has emerged as an effective approach to solve this problem. In this approach, the path planner captures the connectivity of a space F by building a probabilistic roadmap, a network of simple paths connecting points picked at random in F. This paper combines results previously presented in separate papers. It describes a basic probabilistic roadmap planner that is easily parallelizable, and it analyzes the performance of this planner as a function of how well F satisfies geometric properties called ∈-goodness, expansiveness, and path clearance. While ∈-goodness allows us to study how well a probabilistic roadmap covers F, expansiveness and path clearance allow us to compare the connectivity of the roadmap to that of F.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. Akl. Parallel Computation: Models and Methods, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997.
N. Amato, O.B. Bayazit, L.K. Dale, C. Jones, and D. Vallejo. OBPRM: An Obstacle–Based PRM for 3D Workspaces. Proc. Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR), Houston, TX, March 1998.
N. Amato, and Y. Wu. A Randomized Roadmap Method for Path and Manipulation Planning. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 113–120, 1996
J. Barraquand, L.E. Kavraki, J.C. Latombe, T.Y. Li, R. Motwani, and P. Raghavan. A Random Sampling Scheme for Path Planning. Int. J. of Robotics Research, 16 (6): 759–774, 1997.
J. Barraquand and J.C. Latombe. Robot Motion Planning: A Distributed Representation Approach. Int. J. of Robotics Research, 10 (6): 628–649, 1991.
J.F. Canny. The Complexity of Robot Motion Planning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
H, Chang and T.Y. Li. Assembly Maintainability Study with Motion Planning, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya. pp. 1012–1019, 1995.
D.P. Dobkin, J. Hershberger, D.G. Kirkpatrick, and S. Suri. Computing the Intersection Depth of Polyhedra. Algorithmica, 9: 518–533, 1993.
E.G. Gilbert, D.W. Johhson, and S.S. Keerthi. A Fast Procedure for Computing the Distance Between Complex Robots in Three-Dimensional Space. IEEE Tr. on Robotics and Automation, 4: 193–203, 1988.
J.E. Hopcroft, J.T. Schwartz, and M. Sharir. On the Complexity of Motion Planning for Multiple Independent Objects: PSPACE-Hardness of the ‘Warehouseman’s Problem’. Int. J. of Robotics Research, 3 (l): 76–88, 1984.
J.E. Hopcroft and G.T. Wilfong. Reducing Multiple Object Motion Planning to Graph Searching. SIAM J. on Computing, 15 (3): 768–785, 1986.
T. Horsch, F. Schwarz, and H. Tolle. Motion Planning for Many Degrees of Freedom–Random Reflections at C–Space Obstacles. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA April 1994, pp. 3318–3323.
D. Hsu, L.E. Kavraki, J.C. Latombe, R. Motwani, and S. Sorkin. On Finding Narrow Passages with Probabilistic Roadmap Planners. Proc. Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR), Houston, TX, March 1998.
D. Hsu, J.C. Latombe, and R. Motwani. Path Planning in Expansive Configuration Spaces. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, 1997, pp. 2719–2726. An extended version of this paper will appear in Int. J. of Computational Geometry and Applications.
P. Jiménez, F. Thomas, and C. Torras. Collision Detection Algorithms for Motion Planning. Robot Motion Planning and Control, J.P. Laumond (ed.), Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 229, Springer, New York, NY, 1998, pp. 305–343.
D.A. Joseph and W.H. Plantiga. On the Complexity of Reachability and Motion Planning Questions. Proc. 1st ACM Symp. on Computational Geometry, pp. 62–66, 1985.
L. Kavraki. Random Networks in Configuration Space for Fast Path Planning. Ph.D. Thesis, Rep. No. STAN-CS-TR-95-1535, Department of Computer Science, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 1995.
L. Kavraki, M. Kolountzakis, and J.C. Latombe. Analysis of Probabilistic Roadmaps for Path Planning. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Rob. and Aut., Minneapolis, MN, pp. 3020–3025, 1996.
L. Kavraki, J.C. Latombe, R. Motwani, and P. Raghavan. Randomized Query Processing in Robot Motion Planning. Proc. ACM SIGACT Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC), Las Vegas, Nevada, 1995, pp. 353–362.
L. Kavraki, P. Svestka, J.C. Latombe, and M. Overmars Probabilistic Roadmaps for Path Planning in High-Dimensional Configuration Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(4): 566–580, August 1996.
Y. Koga, K. Kondo, J. Kuffner, and J.C. Latombe. Planning Motions with Intentions. Proc. of SIGGRAPH’94, ACM, pp. 395–408, 1994.
M. Lin and J.F. Canny. A Fast Algorithm for Incremental Distance Computation. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, 1994, pp. 602–608.
M. Lin, D. Manocha, J. Cohen, and S. Gottschalk. Collision detection: Algorithms and applications. Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics, Goldberg et al. (Eds), A K Peters, Ltd., 1995, pp. 129–141.
B. Mirtich. V-Clip: Fast and Robust Polyhedral Collision Detection. Tech. Rep. TR97-05, Mitsubishi El. Res. Lab., Cambridge, MA, 1997.
R. Motwani and P. Raghavan. Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995
C. J. Ong. On the Quantification of Penetration between General Objects. Int. J. of Robotics Research, 16 (3): 400–409, 1997.
C.J. Ong and E.G. Gilbert. Growth Distances: New Measures for Object Separation and Penetration. IEEE Tr. on Robotics and Automation, 12 (6): 888–903, 1996.
M. Overmars. A random Approach to Motion Planning. Technical Report, RUU–CS–92–32, Department of Computer Science, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1992.
M. Overmars and P. Švestka. A Probabilistic Learning Approach to Motion Planning. Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics, K. Goldberg et al. (eds.), A.K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1995, pp. 19–37.
S. Quinlan. Efficient Distance Computation Between Non-Convex Objects. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, pp. 3324–3330, 1994.
J. Reif. Complexity of the Mover’s Problem and Generalizations. Proc. IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, pp. 421– 427, 1979.
P. Švestka and M. Overmars. Probabilistic Path Planning. Robot Motion Planning and Control, J.P. Laumond (ed.), Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 229, Springer, New York, NY, 1998, pp. 255–304.
Schwartz, J.T. and Sharir, M. 1983. On the ‘Piano Movers’ Problem: II. General Techniques for Computing Topological Properties of Real Algebraic Manifolds. Advances in Applied Mathematics. 4: 298–351.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hsu, D., Latombe, JC., Motwani, R., Kavraki, L.E. (1999). Capturing the Connectivity of High-Dimensional Geometric Spaces by Parallelizable Random Sampling Techniques. In: Pardalos, P.M., Rajasekaran, S. (eds) Advances in Randomized Parallel Computing. Combinatorial Optimization, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3282-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3282-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3284-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3282-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive