Advertisement

Quantum Mechanical Angular Distributions and Group Representations on Banach Spaces

  • Michael P. Strand
  • R. Stephen Berry

Abstract

In large classes of scattering experiments in atomic, molecular, and nuclear physics the angular distribution of a product of the reaction can be described by simple trigonometric formulae. For example, the angular distribution of a particle ejected from an unpolarized target due to the absorption of a photon via a dipole process takes the phenomenological form A + B cos2 θ. The microscopic parameters describing the detailed structure of the target determine the values of the macroscopic parameters A and B but do not change the phenomenological form. We show that the phenomenological form of an angular distribution may be simply derived from physically induced representations of the rotation group on the space of states and on the space of observables which are represented, respectively, by the trace class operators T(H) and the bounded operators L(H) on a Hilbert space H. Specifically we show that with appropriate topologies the representations on T(H) and L(H) are completely reducible and that Schur’s lemma applies. These results lead to the appropriate phenomenological form for the angular distribution and also provide straightforward procedures for evaluating the macroscopic parameters in terms of microscopic parameters and geometrical factors.

Keywords

Angular Distribution Pure State Unitary Representation Density Operator Observable Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. P. Strand and R. S. Berry (submitted to J. Math. Phys.).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. P. Strand and R. S. Berry (to be submitted).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. P. Strand, Doctoral Thesis, University of Chicago (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. P. Wigner, Group Theory ( Academic Press, New York, 1959 ).MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. W. Mackey, Unitary Group Representations in Physics, Probability and Number Theory (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, Mass., 1978 ).MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 74 (1957).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. E. Edwards, Fourier Series, Vol. 1, 2nd Ed. ( Holt, Reinhardt, and Winston, New York, 1979 ).MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    See, e.g., E. B. Davies, Quantum Theory of Open Systems (Academic Press, New York, 1976 ).MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael P. Strand
    • 1
  • R. Stephen Berry
    • 2
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Laboratory AstrophysicsUniversity of Colorado and National Bureau of StandardsBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations