Land Use Planning as a Response to Market Failure
Public sector objectives in land use policy planning can be evaluated by comparing them with the various types of market failure. In general public policy corrects some instances of market failure, fails to correct others, and creates yet others. By using a market failure perspective government could greatly reduce negative externalities in the form of pollution and land use incompatabilities, inefficiencies in the provision of public services along with the attendant incentives for sprawl, as well as the costs inequities of achieving social objectives. These results would come from designing policies to take advantage of and enhance market processes rather than replacing markets with political process.
KeywordsTransportation Income Sewage Expense Defend
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Clawson, Marion. Suburban Land Conversion in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
- Downing, Paul B. (ed.). Local Service Pricing Policies and Their Effect on Urban Spatial Structure. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1977.Google Scholar
- Freeman, A. Myrick III. The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
- Hagman, Donald G., and Misczynski, Dean J. Windfalls for Wipeouts: Land Value Capture and Compensation. Chicago: American Planning Association, 1978.Google Scholar
- Lee, Douglass B., Jr. “Nuisance Law Applied to Land Use Control.” In North Side Neighborhood Preservation Study, Report No. 12. Iowa City: Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa, 1978.Google Scholar
- Mushkin, Selma A. Public Prices for Public Products. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, 1972.Google Scholar
- Nelson, Robert H. Zoning and Property Rights. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1977.Google Scholar
- Reilly, William K. (ed.). The Use of Land: A Citizens’ Guide to Urban Growth. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1973.Google Scholar