## Abstract

As pointed out by Gudder,^{1} the problem of providing a definition of tensor product for general quantum logics seems to be unavoidable if a theory of quantum measurement is addressed and developed in the context of quantum logics. More specifically, suppose we have two physical systems Σ and \(\tilde \Sigma\) with corresponding logics L and \(\tilde L\). For instance Σ could be the physical system under study and \(\tilde \Sigma\) a measure-merit apparatus. If one wants to study the compound physical system \(\Sigma \; + \;\tilde \Sigma\) with corresponding logic L, one has to provide a definition of (tensor) product of L with \(\tilde L\) in order to obtain L. A solution of the general problem should contain as special cases the following standard situations. Suppose first that both Σ and E are classical systems with phase space A and Ã respectively and associated logics L = P(A), L = P(Ã) the power set of their phase spaces. In this case L is provided by the power set of the cartesian product of the phase spaces, namely by L = P(A × Ã).

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- 1.S.P. Gudder, in “Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory”, A.R. Marlow ed., Academic Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
- 2.K.E. Hellwig and D. Krausser, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974), p. 261.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.K.E. Hellwig and D. Krausser, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 16 (1977), p. 775.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.A. Zecca, J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978), p. 1482.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D. Aerts and I Daubechies, Helv. Phys. Acta 51 (1978), p. 661.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 6.D.J. Foulis and C.H. Randall, Empirical logic and tensor product, in “Proceedings of the Colloquium on the Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theories, Marburg 1979”, Holger Neumann ed., to appear.Google Scholar
- 7.C.H. Randall and D.J. Foulis, Operational statistics and tensor product, in “Proc. Colloq. on the Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theories, Marburg 1979”, Holger Neumann ed., to appear.Google Scholar
- 8.F. Maeda and S. Maeda, “Theory of Symmetric Lattices”, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1970).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.C. Piron, “Foundations of Quantum Physics”, Benjamin, London (1976).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.S.S. Holland, Trans. A.M.S. 108 (1963), p. 66.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.A. Zecca, “The Superposition of the States and the Logic Approach to Quantum Mechanics”, IFUM 229/FT, Milano (March 1979).Google Scholar
- 12.M. Hughenholtz, Commun. Math. Phys. 6 (1967), p. 189.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar