The Calculation of the Decay Rate of the Proton
All attempts which have been made to construct a model which unifies the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions predict the existence of currents which transform quarks into leptons and this generally leads to the prediction that the proton is unstable. Now usually when a theorist predicts the existence of an exotic interaction for which there is no experimental evidence, he keeps one step ahead of the experimentalists by arguing that the mass of the particles which mediate this exotic interaction are arbitrarily massive so that as the experimentalists decrease the upper bound on this interaction the theorist increases these masses. In a certain class of grand unified theories this option is closed since the masses of the particles mediating the interactions which lead to proton decay are exactly calculable. This class of grand unified theories is the class obeying the “desert hypothesis” namely the hypothesis that between the threshold for production of W’s and Z’s (~100 GeV) and grand unification there are no new degrees of freedom which open up. The simplest such model is the SU(5) model of Georgi and Glashow1, and since the point of unification of the strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions is very insensitive† to the exact details of the model provided it obeys the desert hypothesis, I shall work with the SU(5) model.
KeywordsGauge Boson Electromagnetic Interaction Proton Decay Grand Unify Theory Internal Loop
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.T. W. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Phys. Rev. Dll (1975) 2856.Google Scholar
- 6.K. T. Mahanthappa and M. Sher, “Precise Determination of sin2 θw and the Masses of Weak Vector Bosons in SU(5).” Colorado preprint COLO-HEP 13(1979).Google Scholar
- 11.J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, D. V. Nanopoulos and S. Rudaz, LAPP preprint -14/CERN preprint TH-2833 (1980).Google Scholar
- 16.T. Goldman and D. A. Ross, “How Accurately Can We Estimate the Proton Lifetime in an SU(5) Grand Unified Model?” Caltech Preprint, CALT-68-759 (1980).Google Scholar
- 17.C. Llewellyn Smith and G. G. Ross, Oxford University preprint in preparation.Google Scholar
- 18.P. Binétruy and T. Schücker, “Gauge and Renormalization Scheme Dependence in GUTS,” CERN preprint TH-2802 (1979).Google Scholar
- 19.W. Marciano, “Theoretic Aspects of Proton Decay,” Rockefeller University preprint, COO-2232B-195 (1980).Google Scholar
- 20.N. P. Chang, A. Das, and J. Perez-Mercader,“Proton Stability in an Asymptotically Free SU(5) Theory,” CCNY-HEP-79-24 (1979) and- CCNY-HEP-79-25.Google Scholar
- 23.G. R. Cook, K. T. Mahanthappa, and M. A. Sher, Phys. Letters 90B (1980)398.Google Scholar
- 26.J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Letters 88B (1979)320.Google Scholar
- 29.A. Din, G. Girardi and P. Sorba, Phys. Letters 91B (19 80) 77.Google Scholar
- 30.J. Donoghue, “Proton Lifetime and Branching Ratios in SU(5),” MIT preprint, CTP-824 (1979).Google Scholar