Subcomponent Models for Quarks and Leptons: Difficulties and Perspectives

  • R. Gatto
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 7)


When learning that I am working on subcomponents of quarks and leptons, my friends usually ask me for my possible motivations in spending my time in such intriguing business. Frankly I reply that the best answer I can give is that my motivations are mostly personal. When you are at a certain age, with all the various burdens etc, you can only devote the little time you are left with for research, either to a less competitive subject, such as for instance history of physics, or to something exotic such as subcomponents. But there are still other reasons, more closely related to the present developments in particle theory. For instance, there is the proliferation of quarks and leptons. Also, as it has become customary to discuss what may happen up to 101 6 GeV or even to 101 9GeV, one cannot avoid the thought that, rigorously, leptons are known to be pointlike only up to 10-1 6÷lO-1 7cm, or in energy, up to say, 1TeV. There are still many, many orders of magnitudes up to the Planck mass, so one asks why one excludes a priori that there may be many more levels of substructure, or at least one more. Other reasons have to do with unification with gravity if it ever will be done. Maybe such unification with gravity if it ever will be done in terms of our quarks and leptons but rather in terms of other more elementary objects.


Chiral Symmetry Clifford Algebra Proton Decay Young Tableau Composite State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, L. Maiani and B. Zumino, these proceedings, p. 69.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdus Salam, in Proc. of the International Conference on High Energy Physics, CERN, Geneva, Vol. 2, p. 868 (1980).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Harari, Phys. Letters 86B (1979) 83.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.A. Shupe, Phys. Letters 86B (1979) 87.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    There is a recent preprint by S.L. Adler (Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, 1979) in this direction.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Casalbuoni and R. Gatto, Phys. Letters 88B (1979) 306. ibid. 90B (1980) 81.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Casalbuoni and R. Gatto, UGVA-DPT 1980/02-235, preprint (1980) (to be published).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.’t Hooft, Lectures given at the Cargese Summer Institute, August, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind (to be published). I would like to thank Prof. Susskind for informing me on this work and also of related work by S. Coleman (to be published).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Pagels and S. Stokar, Phys. Rev. D20 (1979) 2947.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Casher, Phys. Letters 83B (1979) 395.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.L. Curtright and P.G.O. Freund, EFI 79/25, Enrico Fermi Institute, Chicago (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 974; S. Dimopoulos and L. S.sskind, Nuclear Phys. B155 (1979) 237.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Gatto
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de Physique ThéoriqueUniversité de GenèveGenève 4Switzerland

Personalised recommendations