Elastic Moduli of Amorphous Rare-Earth Alloys

  • James R. Cullen
  • M. Melamud
  • K. Hathaway


Crystalline electric field (CEF) effects have been observed using ultrasonic techniques in a variety of magnetic and paramagnetic solids. Dramatic changes in the velocity of sound have been reported in rare earth compounds which undergo structural transitions1 and in magnetically ordered rare earth compounds with large magnetostrictions2. In both cases results are interpretable as arising from the large magnetoelastic coupling, i.e., coupling of the strain field of the sound wave with the 4f electron charge distribution. Large magnetoelastic effects are not confined to crystalline materials. We have shown that the velocity of sound in bulk amorphous rare earth iron alloys is very sensitive to the application of a magnetic field. Here we wish to concentrate on one feature of those measurements, namely the minimum which occurs in the sound velocity as a function of magnetic field. The physical importance of this minimum is its relation to the CEF at the rare earth sites. We will discuss the temperature dependence of this minimum in the light of the random anisotropy model originally introduced to describe the magnetic properties of these alloys. By extending the random anisotropy model to include magnetoelastic coupling, we are able to account for much of the magnetic field dependence of the sound velocity. In particular the model predicts the minimum to occur at twice the local anisotropy energy divided by the value of the local moment. If this description is correct, we then have a measure of the local anisotropy energy for these alloys. It further follows that we have the possibility of determining the temperature dependence of this important physical quantity by observing the field


Sound Velocity Anisotropy Energy Magnetic Field Dependence Rare Earth Compound Magnetoelastic Coupling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Luthi, AIP Conf. Proc. 34 7 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Klimker, M. Rosen, M. P. Dariel, U. Atzmony, Phys. Rev. BI0, 2968 (1974); J. R. Cullen, S. Rinaldi, G. V. Blessing, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 1960 (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Hathaway, M. Melamud, J. Cullen, G. Blessing, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 1636 (1979); M. Melamud, K. Hathaway, J. Cullen, Phys. Lett. 73A, 58 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Cullen, H. Alperin, M. Melamud, K. Hathaway, J. Rhyne, J. Magnetism and Mag. Mat. (to be published).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. A. Alperin, J. R. Cullen, A. E. Clark, AIP Conf. Proc. 29, 186 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Verhelst, R. Kline, A. deGraaf, H. Hooper, Phys. Rev. B11, 4427 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Alben, J. I. Budnick, G. S. Cargill, Metallic Glasses, Ameri can Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1978, p. 304.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. W. Forester, R. Abbundi, R. Segnan, D. Sweger, AIP Conf. Proc. 24, 115 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Cullen
    • 1
  • M. Melamud
    • 2
  • K. Hathaway
    • 2
  1. 1.Naval Surface Weapons CenterWhite Oak, Silver SpringUSA
  2. 2.Naval Surface Weapons Center and American UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations