Advertisement

Effects of Intravesical Formaldehyde-Instillation (Experimental and Clinical Results)

  • R Pust
  • A Rost
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 1)

Abstract

Changes in the urinary bladder wall following intravesical instillation of 5 – 25% formalin were studied in 25 healthy female cats. The contact period varied from one to 20 minutes. With a 20% solution and one minute contact time the bladder urothelium proteins quickly precipitated without necrosis of sub-epithelial layers. Complete re-epithelialisation and normal bladder dynamics (x-ray control) were seen after three to four weeks.

No signs of formaldehyde intoxication were observed. In four of five patients with intractable bleeding of the bladder the intravesical formaldehyde therapy was effective.

Keywords

Muscular Layer Formaldehyde Solution Ureteral Obstruction Bladder Mucosa Intravesical Instillation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albertini, V., A. Histologische Geschwulstdiagnostik. Stuttgard, G. Thieme Verlag (1955).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, R. B. Med. J. Aus. 1, 23 (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fall, M., Peterson, S. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. Suppl. 33, 19 (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    French, D., Edall, J. T. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 2, 277 (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar, S., Rosen, P., Gragstald, H. J. Urol. 114, 540 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malorny, G. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 255, 42 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malorny, G., Rietbrock, N., Schneider, M. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg1s Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 250, 419 (1965).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malorny, G., Rietbrock, N., Schneider, M. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg#x2019;s Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 247, 381 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Persky, L., Austen, G. Jr. J. Urol. 70, 124 (1953).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pool, T. L. Surg. Clin. N. Amer. 39, 947 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pust, R., Butz, M., Tost, A., Ogbuihi, S. and Riedel, Urol. Res. 4, 51 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shah, B. G., Albert, D. J. J. Urol. 110, 519 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whittaker, J. R., Freed, S. Z. J. Urol. 114, 866 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wojewski, A., Roessler, R. Bull. Pol. Med. Sci. Hist. 8, 100 (1965).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zechlin, H. H., Attobrah, F. Urologe B, 18, 106 (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R Pust
    • 1
  • A Rost
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Urology, Klinikum GiessenJ. L.-University GiessenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Urology, Klinikum SteglitzFree University of BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations