Advertisement

The Concept of Identity and Children’s Selective Attention

  • Eliane Vurpillot
  • William A. Ball

Abstract

As a source of information, the environment is inexhaustible, but not all events are relevant to the individual’s present and future activities. Selective processes are inevitably part of cognition, first in determining which information is registered and then in specifying what information will be retained. Thus an initial selection of information may have a spatial component: Sensory systems such as the eyes or hands are oriented to a particular location at a given time. Only a fraction of the information registered will receive further processing, however. This second selection involves active recoding of certain aspects of the perceptual input in order to facilitate subsequent recall and recognition. Both forms of selectivity can occur together, and selective processes obviously play an important role in determining what information about the world an individual will obtain. In selecting only a portion of the available information for detailed processing, people restrict what they can know about the environment. The developmental problem is to determine how children come to adapt their selectivity in ways appropriate to the requirements of their activities.

Keywords

Selective Attention Identical Pair Scanning Strategy Homologous Location Identical Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berlyne, D. E. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berthoud, M. Les systèmes de référence spatiaux et leur interaction chez les enfants d’âge préscolaire. I. Le degré de contrainte des données perceptives. Année Psychologique, 1973, 73, 23–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berthoud, M., & Vurpillot, E. Influence du nombre de différences sur les réponses “pas pareil” chez l’enfant d’âge préscolaire. Enfance, 1970, 23, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mackworth, N. H. The wide angle reflection eye camera for visual choice and pupil size. Perception and Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nunnally, J. C., & Lemond, L. C. Exploratory behavior and human development. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 8 ). New York: Academic, 1973, pp. 60–109.Google Scholar
  6. Sokolov, Y. N. Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan, 1963.Google Scholar
  7. Vurpillot, E. The development of scanning strategies and their relation to visual differentiation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1968, 6, 632–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Vurpillot, E. Contribution à l’étude de la différenciation perceptive chez l’enfant d’âge préscolaire. Année Psychologique, 1969, 69, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vurpillot, E. The visual world of the child. New York: International Universities Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Vurpillot, E. Some effects of stimulus structure and criteria of decision on visual scanning. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Symposium on Attention and Cognition, New Orleans, March 1977. (a)Google Scholar
  11. Vurpillot, E. Définition du “pareil” ou “pas pareil” et stratégies d’exploration oculomotrice chez l’enfant. In G. Oléron (Ed.), Psychologie expérimentale et comparée. Hommage à Paul Fraisse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1977, pp. 339–352. (b)Google Scholar
  12. Vurpillot, E., & Moal, A. Evolution des critères d’identité chez des enfants d’âge préscolaire dans une tâche de différenciation perceptive. Année Psychologique, 1970, 70, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vurpillot, E., & Taranne, P. Jugement d’identité ou de non identité entre dessins et exploration oculomotrice chez des enfants de 5 à 7 ans. Année Psychologique, 1974, 74, 79–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vurpillot, E., & Taranne, P. Pertinence de différences et fréquence d’occurrence d’un élément particulier dans un jugement d’identité chez des enfants d’âge préscolaire. Enfance, 1975, 28, 152–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vurpillot, E., Castelo, R., & Renard, C. Extension de l’exploration visuelle et nombre d’éléments présents sur des stimulus dans une tache de différenciation perceptive. Année Psychologique, 1975, 75, 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vurpillot, E., Lécuyer, R., Moal, A., & Pineau, A. Perception de déplacements et jugements d’identité chez l’enfant d’âge préscolaire. Année Psychologique, 1971, 71, 31–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. White, S. H. Evidence for a hierarchical arrangement of learning processes. In L. P. Lipsitt & C. C. Spiker (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 2 ). New York: Academic, 1965, pp. 187–220.Google Scholar
  18. Wright, J. C., & Vlietstra, A. G. The development of selective attention: From perceptual exploration to logical search. In H. W. Reese (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10 ). New York: Academic, 1975, pp. 195–239.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eliane Vurpillot
    • 1
  • William A. Ball
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie ExpérimentaleUniversité René DescartesParisFrance
  2. 2.Swarthmore CollegeSwarthmoreUSA

Personalised recommendations