Problems in Biofeedback Training: An Experiential Analogy—Urination
The research literature on biofeedback training is filled with contradictions. Certain researchers and experimental settings appear to enhance learning in trainees, whereas other combinations appear to inhibit learning. Further, some researchers, educators, and clinicians suggest that biofeedback can be a useful tool for preventive medicine, since a person who can sense his body response can learn to change or modulate the patterns of his behavior.1 Other researchers, especially those who have been unsuccessful in teaching voluntary control, believe that claims of any usefulness should be made extremely cautiously.
KeywordsVoluntary Control Biofeedback Training Urination Control Autonomic Learning Trial Length
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Luce. G.. & Peper. E. Biofeedback: Mind over body, mind over mind. New York Times Magazine. September 12, 1971.Google Scholar
- 2.Love. W. A., Montgomery, D. D., & Moeller, T. A. Proceedings of the Biofeedback Research Society, Colorado Springs. February 1974, p 35.Google Scholar
- 4.Miller. N. E. In: N. E. Miller, T. X. Barber. L. V. DiCara, etal. (Eds.)., Biofeedback and self-control. 1973. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.Google Scholar
- 6.Black. A. H. In: P. A. Obnst. A. H. Black. J. Brener. & L. V. DiCara (Eds). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. Chicago. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.Google Scholar
- 8.International Committee on Autogenic Therapy. Certification, regulations. Montreal Central ICAT Registration Office. 1973.Google Scholar
- 9.Peper. E. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans. 1974.Google Scholar
- 10.Budzynski. T„ & Stoyva. J. In: N. Biraumer (Ed.), The mastery of anxiety: Contribution of neurophysiology to anxiety research. Reihe Fortschr. Klini. Psychol.. Bd. 3. Munich: Wein: Verlag. Urban & Schwarzenberg. 1973. p. 248.Google Scholar