Problems in Biofeedback Training: An Experiential Analogy—Urination

  • Erik Peper


The research literature on biofeedback training is filled with contradictions. Certain researchers and experimental settings appear to enhance learning in trainees, whereas other combinations appear to inhibit learning. Further, some researchers, educators, and clinicians suggest that biofeedback can be a useful tool for preventive medicine, since a person who can sense his body response can learn to change or modulate the patterns of his behavior.1 Other researchers, especially those who have been unsuccessful in teaching voluntary control, believe that claims of any usefulness should be made extremely cautiously.


Voluntary Control Biofeedback Training Urination Control Autonomic Learning Trial Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Luce. G.. & Peper. E. Biofeedback: Mind over body, mind over mind. New York Times Magazine. September 12, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Love. W. A., Montgomery, D. D., & Moeller, T. A. Proceedings of the Biofeedback Research Society, Colorado Springs. February 1974, p 35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sterman. M B. Seminars in Psychiatry, 1973, 5 (4), 507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller. N. E. In: N. E. Miller, T. X. Barber. L. V. DiCara, etal. (Eds.)., Biofeedback and self-control. 1973. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller. N. E. Science. 1969. 163. 434–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Black. A. H. In: P. A. Obnst. A. H. Black. J. Brener. & L. V. DiCara (Eds). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. Chicago. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lapides. J.. Sweet. R. B. & Lewis, L. W. Journal of Urology, 1957, 77. 247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Committee on Autogenic Therapy. Certification, regulations. Montreal Central ICAT Registration Office. 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peper. E. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans. 1974.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Budzynski. T„ & Stoyva. J. In: N. Biraumer (Ed.), The mastery of anxiety: Contribution of neurophysiology to anxiety research. Reihe Fortschr. Klini. Psychol.. Bd. 3. Munich: Wein: Verlag. Urban & Schwarzenberg. 1973. p. 248.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Peper
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Interdisciplinary ScienceSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations