A Beginner’s Behavioral Test Guide to Biofeedback Instrumentation

  • Erik Peper


This chapter focuses on a few techniques that a practitioner should know when he uses biofeedback equipment. Since biofeedback is a psychophysiological mirror, it is useful only if the equipment records and amplifies the biological signal accurately. The techniques discussed will apply to electromyographic (EMG), thermal, electrodermal (EDR or GSR), or skin potential response (SPR), and electroencephalic (EEG) biofeedback equipment. Obviously these concepts can be extended to other feedback devices not discussed here. The recorded measures must be accurate so that the practitioner can interpret changes in the feedback signal as indications of changes in the psychophysiology or autonomic self-regulation of the trainee (Peper, 1974). (The term trainee is used instead of patient or client as I perceive biofeedback training as a learning tool.) For example, the EMG of the forearm extensor could be as high as 18 μV even though there is no voluntary muscle tension. The reading may imply that the person had tensed his forearm extensors through lifting the fingers or bending the hand back at the wrist, and that the reading is not due to artifacts such as 60-Hz or sensor (electrode) lead movements. To avoid misinterpretation of the recorded physiological data, the practitioner should be familiar with the human interface of the equipment: (1) knowledge of the equipment, i.e.. the flow diagram, which is a schematic representation of how the signal is processed; (2) external, internal, and physiological factors affecting the biological functions recorded; and (3) suggested behavioral testing procedures to assess whether the biofeedback equipment is working.


Nicotine Tempo Barbiturate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Basmajian, JV, Facts vs. myths in EMG biofeedback. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1976. 1(4). 369 371.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, C, Methods in pathophysiology. Baltimore Williams & Wilkins, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Cromwell, L, Weibell. G J., Pfeiffer. E. A. & Usselman, L B. Biomedical instrumentation and measurements. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Geddes, L A, & Baker. L. F. Principles of applied biomedical instrumentation. New York: Wiley. 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Greenfield, N. S., & Sternbach, R, Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Holt. Rinehart & Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. Mulholland, T B, & Peper, E Occipital alpha and accommodative vergence. pursuit tracking and fast eye movements. Psychophysiology, 1971. 8 (5). 556–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peper, L, Problems in heart rate and alpha electrocncephalographic feedback. Kybernetik. 1974. 14. 217–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Peper
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Interdisciplinary ScienceSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations