The Application of Geometric Modeling to Metal Casting Technology

  • John T. Berry
  • J. A. M. Boulet


In the course of a large scale cooperative research effort between two major universities, The Georgia Institute of Technology and The University of Michigan, several geometric modeling packages have been examined and utilized in the building of various casting/rigging configurations. Modelers scrutinized include TIPS-1, PADL-1, ROMULUS and CAT-1. The test castings involved have included simple laboratory shapes as well as industrial product parts.

In general, we have found that acceptable model forms can be built without major difficulty. In some cases, depending for example upon the availability of primitives, certain approximations are necessary; in other instances the limited number of allowable statements has dictated such approximations. Furthermore, we have learned that work remains to be done on the questions of blending and the representation of the other patternmaking needs such as parting line determination, an area in which one surface-type modeler, DUCT, has already made extensive progress.

The most pressing needs of metal casting engineers working in this area, however, are applications packages to provide geometric modelers with the general purpose physical simulation schemes now available and the special purpose casting-oriented simulators under development.

This paper will describe the CADCAST team’s experience with the present generation of modelers, as well as its work in developing various applications packages which are intended for integration into package suites designed to fill the needs of the industry in the near future.


Molten Metal Heat Pipe Ductile Cast Iron Georgia Institute Mold Cavity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [AFSoftware]
    D. C. Schmidt, RISER User’s Manual, 1984, available from American Foundrymen’s Society, Golf and Wolf Roads, Des Plaines, Illinois 60016.Google Scholar
  2. [Berry et al. 1984]
    J. T. Berry, F. Salame, E. E. Underwood, and C. W. Meyers, “Final Report: An Investigation of Factors Affecting the Machinability of Ductile Cast Irons,” prepared for the Ductile Iron Society, P. O. Box 1105, Mountainside, New Jersey 07092, April 1984.Google Scholar
  3. [Boulet and Dalton 1983]
    J. A. M. Boulet and B. B. Dalton, “A CAD System for Solidification Simulation,” presented at the American Foundrymen’s Society Casting Congress, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. [CAT-1]
    Cat Guide, The User’s Manual, Cat Soft 1.1, 1982, Catronix Corporation, 120 Ralph McGill Boulevard, N.E., Suite 800, Atlanta, Georgia 30308, Attn: Dr. Jo Ellen Bradham.Google Scholar
  5. [Chvorinov 1940]
    N. Chvorinov, “Theory of Casting Solidification,” Giesserei, Vol. 127, No. 111, 1940, pp. 201–208; Vol. 27, No. 12, 1940, pp. 222–225.Google Scholar
    J. E. Pickin and A. Beattie, CRUSADER Method Design System User’s Manual, 1984, available from Steel Castings Research and Trade Association, Astbank Road, Sheffield, S23TT, England (Telephone 0742–28647).Google Scholar
  7. [DUCT]
    T. H. Gossling, “The DUCT System of Design for Practical Objects,” Proceedings of the World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Milan, Italy, 1976.Google Scholar
  8. [Flinn 1963]
    R. A. Flinn, Fundamentals of Metal Casting, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. [Kotschi 1983]
    R. Kotschi, “Computer Methods in the Foundry,” presented at the 1983 Engineering Foundation Conference on the Modeling of Casting and Welding Processes, New England College, Henniker, New Hampshire, July 31-August 5, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. [Novacast]
    Novacast software available through Novacast, Ronnebyvag 1, Box 2034, S-372 02 Ronneby, Sweden.Google Scholar
  11. [PADL-1]
    H. B. Voelcker, A. A. G. Requicha, E. E. Hartquist, W. B. Fisher, J. E. Shopiro, and N. K. Birrell, “An Introduction to PADL: Characteristics, Status, and Rationale,” Technical Memo No. 22, Production Automation Project, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, December 1974.Google Scholar
  12. [ROMULUS]
    P. Veenman, ROMULUS: User’s and Programmer’s Guide, Shape Data Ltd., Cambridge, England, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. [Ruddle and Suschill 1983]
    R. W. Ruddle and A. L. Suschill, “Riser Sizing by Microcomputer,” presented at the 1983 Engineering Foundation on the Modeling of Casting and Welding Processes, New England College, Henniker, New Hampshire, July 31-August 5, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. [Sillen 1983]
    R. Sillen, “Microcomputers and Programs for Foundry Calculations,” Modern Casting, Vol. 73, No. 8, August 1983, pp. 35–37.Google Scholar
  15. [TIPS-1]
    N. Okino and TIPS-1 Working Group, “TIPS-1,” Institute of Precision Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. [Welbourn 1982]
    D. B. Welbourn, “Computer Aided Engineering in the Foundry Industry,” Giesserei, Vol. 69, No. 25, 1982, pp. 734–744.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • John T. Berry
    • 1
  • J. A. M. Boulet
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations