Bridging the Gap
We will review some of the historical background, biological and political, of the last two decades. The Pandora Project, the ERMAC Committee, the confusion engendered by different Federal Agency roles and admissions, issues involved in broadcasting regulation, all compounded by the public concern over the environment. Both the evolutionary development of man and our current knowledge of neurophysiology has long led to at least an intuitive belief that electromagnetic energy must influence body processes. However, until recent years there has been almost a total failure to confirm this other than in simple thermalization of the energy. The intrinsic complexity of biological systems has made it difficult to apply the rather simplistic theorems of the physical world. However, the increasing capability of the computer coupled with a mathematical structure of the behavior of physical systems with non-linear characteristics are beginning to lead to a breakthrough. An attempt will be made to summarize some of the key technical points that have been presented during the conference. Some recent results of a collaborative program at Johns Hopkins University permitting observation of a single cellular layer in vivo illustrating electromagnetic interaction phenomena will be summarized.
KeywordsFederal Communication Commission Corneal Endothelium Specular Microscope Telecommunication Policy National Telecommunication
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.“Unclassified Documents Pertaining to Project Pandora,” Hearings before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, 95th Congress, First Session on Oversight of Radiation Health and Safety, June 16, 17, 27, 28 and 29, 1977, Serial No. 95-49, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1977).Google Scholar
- 3.Report on “Program for Control of Electromagnetic Pollution of the Environment: The Assessment of Biological Hazards of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation,” issued by the Office of Telecommunications Policy (March 1973).Google Scholar
- 4.“Fifth Report on Program for Control of Electromagnetic Polution of the Environment — The Assessment of Biological Hazards of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation.” NTIA Report 79–19, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, DC (March 1979).Google Scholar
- 7.B. V. Chirkikov, A Universal Instability of Many-Dimensional Oscillator Systems, Physics Reports, 52, No. 5 (1979) 263–379, North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- 8.M. J. Feigenbaum, Universal Behavior in Nonlinear Systems, Los Alamos Science, 4–27 (1980).Google Scholar
- 10.Leonard S. Taylor, The Mechanisms of Athermal Microwave Biological Effects, Electromagnetics 2: 259–267 (1981).Google Scholar
- 11.A. F. Lawrence and W. Ross Adey, Nonlinear Wave Mechanisms in Interactions between Excitable Tissue and Electromagnetic Fields, Neurological Research, Vol. 4, No. 1 /2 (1982).Google Scholar
- 12.H. A. Kues, L. W. Hirst, S. A. D’Anna and G. Dunkelberger, Effects of 2.45 GHz Microwaves on the Primate Corneal Endothelium, to be published in Bioelectromagnetics.Google Scholar