Skip to main content

Evaluation of Adhesive Test Methods

  • Chapter
Adhesive Joints

Abstract

Three approaches to bond strength analysis are discussed in this article: those based upon linear elastic stresses, those based upon linear fracture mechanics parameters, and those based upon nonlinear analyses. The first two approaches are then discussed with respect to standard adhesion test methods. The stresses in linear lap shear test specimens are shown analytically and experimentally to be concentrated at the bond termination and to be strongly dependent upon adherend thickness for standard tests. The bond stress intensity factors and energy release rates near the bond termination are given and discussed. Adherend thickness should be at least 4 times larger than that recommended by standard test techniques. The stresses in butt tensile tests are also discussed. It is shown that test specimen alignment problems can lead to low debond forces and excessively large data scatter. Stress intensity factors are also determined for butt tensile tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. P. Anderson, S. J. Bennett and K. L. DeVries, “Analysis and Testing of Adhesive Bonds,” Academic Press, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. J. Bikerman, J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 60T, 23, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Mostovoy and E. J. Ripling, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 15, 661 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O. Volkersen, Luftfahrtforschung, 15, 41 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Goland and E. Reissner, J. Appl. Mechanics, 11, 17 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. J. Plantema, “De Schuifspanning in eme Lijmnaad,” Report M1181, Nat. Luchtvaartlaboratorium, Amsterdam (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. R. Wooley and D. R. Carver, J. Aircraft, 8, No. 10, 817 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. D. Adams and N. A. Peppiatt, J. Strain Analysis, 9, No. 3, 185 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. S. Cooper and J. W. Sawyer, “A Critical Examination of Stresses in an Elastic Single Lap Joint,” NASA Technical Report 1507, NASA Scientific and Technical Information Branch (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Amij ima, A. Yoshida and T. Fujii, “Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Composite Materials,” Toronto, Canada, Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1185 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. K. Sen and R. M. Jones, AIAA J., 18, No. 10, 1237 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. K. Sen and R. M. Jones, AIAA J., 18, No. 11, 1376 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. N. Sharpe and T. J. Muha, in Proceedings of the Army Symposium on Solid Mechanics, Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown, Mass. AMMRC MS-74-8, 23 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. J. Renton, Experimental Mechanics, 16, No. 11, 409 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. R. Guess, R. E. Allred and F. P. Gerstle, J. Testing and Evaluation, 5, No. 2, 84 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. H. River, Adhesives Age, 24, No. 12, 30 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. N. Gent, “Strength of Adhesive Bonds - Plastic and Viscoelastic Effects,” Proceedings - 46th National Colloid Sym., Amherst, Mass. (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. D. Bascom and R. L. Cottington, J. Adhesion, 1, 333 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. L. DeVries, M. L. Williams and M. D. Chang, Society for Experimental Stress Analysis preprints, 21 Bridge Square, Westport, CT, Cleveland Meeting (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. D. Adams and N. A. Peppiatt, J. Strain Analysis, 8, 134 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. D. Crocombe and R. D. Adams, J. Adhesion, 13, 141 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. L. Hein and F. Erdogan, Int. J. Fracture Mechanics, 7, 317 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. H. Dill, A. L. Deak and W. F. Schmidt, in “Handbook for the Engineering Structural Analysis of Solid Propellants,” Ch. 5, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency Publication 214, Applied Physics Lab, Silver Spring, MD, May 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Nakayama, K. Tozawa, A. Hirano, and O. Ohkubo, “Effect of Adhesive Layer Thickness on Strength Characteristics of Adhesive - Bonded Soft Joint Specimen Under Static Tensile and Push-Pull Fatigue Load Conditions,” Proceedings 22nd Japan Cong. on Mater. Res. - Metallic Materials, Society of Materials Science, Kyoto, Japan (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. D. Bascom, R. L. Cottington and C. 0. Timmons, J. Appl. Polymer Sci. Applied Polymer Symposium 32, 165 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. J. Chang and A. N. Gent, J. Polymer Sci.: Polymer Phys. Ed., 19, 1619 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. L. Williams, Bulletin Seismological Soc. America 49, No. 2, 199 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, G.P., DeVries, K.L., Sharon, G. (1984). Evaluation of Adhesive Test Methods. In: Mittal, K.L. (eds) Adhesive Joints. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2749-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2749-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9702-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2749-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics