Skip to main content

How to Get Research Approved by an Institutional Review Board

  • Chapter
Book cover Protection of Human Research Subjects
  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

We have seen in previous chapters how Institutional Review Boards have come to wield the power they currently have and we have examined some of the issues which they examine. For example, we have seen that procedures for informed consent appear to be one of the most common areas of a research proposal to receive the closest scrutiny by IRBs. Thus one entire chapter of this volume was devoted to the intricacies of constructing a consent form so that a researcher can ethically protect subjects. An assumption maintained throughout these discussions has been that the well-prepared researcher who, among other activities, constructs a good consent form will have little difficulty obtaining IRB approval for the research. Such approval is often then followed by the researcher’s sending various materials on to a funding agency to receive funds necessary to support the research. Obtaining IRB approval of the researcher’s subject-protection procedures is therefore usually the last step before obtaining research funds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Seheerenberger, R. C. A review of B. H. Gray’s Human subjects in medical experimentation: A sociological study of the conduct and regulation of clinical research, 1975.InMental Retardation, 1976, 14 (2), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. E. A review of B. H. Gray’s Human subjects in medical experimentation: A sociological study of the conduct and regulation of clinical research, 1975.InSocial Science and Medicine, 1975, 9 (10), 564 – 565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundner, T. M. Two formulas for determining the readability of subject consent forms.American Psychologist, 1978 (August), 773–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesch, R. A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948, 32 (3), 221–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, E. A readability formula that saves time.Journal of Reading, 1968,11, 513–516, 575–578.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maloney, D.M. (1984). How to Get Research Approved by an Institutional Review Board. In: Protection of Human Research Subjects. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2703-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2703-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9679-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2703-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics