Advertisement

Characterization of Two Isomeric Cyano-Ester Homologous Series — I

  • J. W. Goodby
  • T. M. Leslie
  • P. E. Cladis
  • P. L. Finn

Abstract

Current theories concerning the incidence of the reentrant nematic phase in liquid crystals generally incorporate the extent to which the molecules are paired in the nematic phase as a basis for the occurence of reentrant phenomenon. In this study we sought to prepare materials in which the dipolar forces within the constituent molecules could be altered and hence, the degree of pairing in the nematic phase could be changed. Thus, a comparison of the properties of the 4-cyanophenyl 4’-n-alkoxybenzoates with those of the 4-n-alkoxyphenyl 4’-cyanobenzoates was made. It was found that the latter series exhibited unusual properties; an injection of smectic C phases and dual crystalline forms which melted at different temperatures. Indeed, the injection of smectic C properties into the series appears to indicate that the pairing is so strong that the reentrant phase gives way to smectic C formation; this formation in itself is unusual when observed for cyano compounds.

Keywords

Binary Mixture Homologous Series Cyano Group Nematic Phase Smectic Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. E. Cladis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 48, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. E. Cladis, R. K. Bogardus, D. Aadsen, Phys. Rev. A18, 2292, (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Guillon, P. E. Cladis, D. Aadsen, W. B. Daniles, Phys. Rev. Lett. A21, 658, (1980)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Hardouin, G. Sigaud, M. F. Achanel, H. Gasparoux, Phys. Lett. 71A, 347, (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. S. Pershan, J. Prost, J. Phys. 40, L27, (1979)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Prost, Liquid Crystals of One— and Two— Dimensional Order, eds. W. Helfrich, G. Heppke, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1980, p. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. E. Cladis, D. Guillon, F. Bouchet, P. L. Finn, Phys. Rev. 23A, 2594, (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. E. Cladis, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 67., 177, (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Weissflog, N. K. Sharma, G. Pelzl, D. Demus, Krist. Und Tech., 15, 35, (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Boiler, H. Scherrer, M. Schadt, P. Wild, Proc. IEEE 160, 1002, (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Weissflog, G. Pelzl, A. Wiegeleben, D. Demus, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Lett. 56, 295, (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. J. W. Goodby, unpublished results.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Pelzl, S. Diele, A. Wiegeleben, D. Demus, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Lett. 64, 163, (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. A8, 1921, 1973Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Wulf, Phys. Rev., All, 365, (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. W. Goodby, G. W. Gray, D. G. McDonnel, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Crystl. Lett. 41, 145, (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Goodby
    • 1
  • T. M. Leslie
    • 1
  • P. E. Cladis
    • 1
  • P. L. Finn
    • 1
  1. 1.Bell LaboratoriesUSA

Personalised recommendations