Working Smarter the Japanese Way: The X-Efficiency of Theory Z Management

  • John F. Tomer

Abstract

A number of recent organizational behavior studies (see, for example, Ouchi, 1981; Pascale and Athos, 1981) agree that the important differences between Japanese management and American management explain in large part why Japan, and not just its auto industry, has been able to achieve rates of growth in productivity much higher than the U.S. since the 1950s. These studies suggest that a critical dimension of Japanese management is the nature of their employer-employee relationship which motivate organization members to work “smarter” than their counterparts in th U.S. In other words, Japanese firms are simply more X-efficient i.e., their productivity is closer to potential, than American ones. If so, why? The purpose of this article is to adapt economic theory (notably X-efficiency theory and transaction cost economics1) to the task of explaining why one would expect organizations managed Japanese style to be more effective in achieving both labor productivity closer to potential (for given technology and capital inputs) and growth in productivity.2

Keywords

Income Coherence Expense Posit Mandel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization,Am. Econ. Rev.62, 777 - 795.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. (1960).Understanding Organizational Behavior, The Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois. (1983).Google Scholar
  3. Barney, J. B. (1983).Theory Z, Institutional Economics, and the Theory of Strategy, Paper presented at Wharton Conference on Productivity, Technology, and Organizational Innovation.Google Scholar
  4. Byrd, R. E. (1974).A Guide to Personal Risk Taking, AMACOM, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cable, J. R., and FitzRoy, F. R. (1980). Productive efficiency, incentives and employee participation: Some preliminary results for West Germany,Kyklos33 (1), 100 – 121.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, R. (1979).The Japanese Company, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  7. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm,Economica(New Series), 4, 386 – 405.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, R. G. (1983).Organizational Structure and Productivity: The Economics of Theory Z, Paper presented at the Second U.S.-Japan Business Conference, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  9. Denison, E. F., and Chung, W. K. (1976).How Japan’s Economy Grew So Fast: The Sources of Postwar Expansion, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. FitzRoy, F. R., and Mueller, D. C. (1977).Contract and the Economics of Organization, Paper presented at Fourth Interlaken Seminar on Analysis and Ideology.Google Scholar
  11. Gabarro, J. (1979). Socialization at the top—how CEOs and subordinates evolve interpersonal contracts,Organ. Dyn. Winter, 3 – 23.Google Scholar
  12. Grayson, C. J. (1982). Emphasizing capital investment is a mistake,Wall St. J., October 11.Google Scholar
  13. Hayes, R. H., and Abernathy, W. J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline,Harv. Bus. Rev.58, 67 – 77.Google Scholar
  14. Jorgenson, D. W., and Nishimizu, M. (1978). U.S. and Japanese economic growth, 1952–1974: an international comparison,The Econ. J.88, 707 – 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawler, E. E., and Rhode, J. G. (1976).Information and Control in Organizations, Goodyear Publishing Co. Santa Monica, California.Google Scholar
  16. Leibenstein, H. (1976).Beyond Economic Man: A New Foundation for Microeconomics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  17. Leibenstein, H. (1982a).The Japanese Management System: An X-Efficiency Game Theory Analysis, Harvard Institute of Econimic Research, Dis¬cussion Paper No. 938.Google Scholar
  18. Leibenstein, H. (1982). “Worker Motivation and X-Efficiency Theory: A Comment”J. Econ. Issues16, 872 – 873.Google Scholar
  19. Levinson, H., Price, Charlton R., Munden, Kenneth J., Mandel, Harold J., Solley, Charles, M. (1963).Men, Management and Mental Health, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  20. Likert, R. (1961).New Patterns of Management, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Macneil, I. R. (1980).The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  22. Maital, S., and Maital, S. (1977). “Time preference, delay of gratification and the intergenerational transmission of economic inequality: A behavioral theory of income distribution,” inEssays in Labor Market Analysis, (Ashenfelter, O. C., and Oates, W. eds.), Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Marsh, R. M., and Mannari, H. (1976).Modernization of the Japanese Factory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  24. Maslow, A. H. (1971).The Farther Reaches of Human Nature, Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
  25. McNally, M. (1981). On X-efficiency,J. Post Keynesian Econ4, 145 – 148.Google Scholar
  26. Okun, A. M. (1981).Prices and Quantities: A Macro economic Analysis. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Ouchi, W. G. (1981).Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Addison-Wesley, Reading Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  28. Ouchi, W. G., and Price, R. L. (1978). Hierarchies, clans, and theory Z: A new perspective on organizational development,Organ. Dyn. Autumn, 25 – 44.Google Scholar
  29. Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets bureaucracies and clans,Admin. Sci. Q.25, 129 – 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pascale, R. T., and Athos, A. G. (1981).The Art of Japanese Management: Applications for American Executives, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Peters, T. J., and Waterman, R. H. (1982).In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Riggs, J. L., and Seo, K. K. (1979). Wa: Personnel factor of Japanese productivity,Ind. Eng. April, 32 – 35.Google Scholar
  33. Thomas, R. R. (1978).Managing the Psychological Contract, Harvard Business School Case Services, Boston.Google Scholar
  34. Schein, E. H. (1981). Does Japanese management style have a message for American managers?Sloan Manage. Rev.23, 55 – 68.Google Scholar
  35. Tomer, J. F. (1981a). Organizational change, organizational capital and economic growth,East. Econ. J.7, 1 – 14.Google Scholar
  36. Tomer, J. F. (1981b). Worker motivation: A neglected element in micro- micro theory,J. Econ. Issues15, 351 – 362.Google Scholar
  37. Tomer, J. F. (1983a) The Japanese company: The challenge for economists,East. Econ. J.9, 57 – 68.Google Scholar
  38. Tomer, J. F. (1983b).Productivity Through Cooperation: The Role of Japanese and Gandhian Development Strategies, unpublished paper prepared for the Third World Congress of Social Economics at Fresno, California.Google Scholar
  39. Vogel, E. (1979).Japan as Number One: Lessons for America, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Wilkins, A. L., and Ouchi, W. G. (1983). Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance,Admin. Sci. Q.28, 468 – 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes,J. Econ. Lit.19, 1537 – 1568.Google Scholar
  42. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual economics,J. Law Econ.22, 233 – 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. Tomer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceManhattan CollegeRiverdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations