This chapter seeks to make two principal points. The first is that upward mobility on the part of disadvantaged persons in the cities has been, is being, and doubtlessly will be, hampered by laws and regulations the manifest purpose of which is to make them better off. The second is that as our society becomes more sensitive to social injustices (real and imagined) it thereby becomes less capable of coping with certain of its problems; indeed, it increasingly confronts the dilemma that a good society, if it is to remain one, must sometimes do things that are incompatible with its goodness.
KeywordsMinimum Wage Upward Mobility Social Injustice Depressed Area American Enterprise Institute
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.The account of the IBM plant is based on Edward C. Banfield, “An Act of Corporate Citizenship,” ed., Peter B. Doeringer, Programs to Employ the Disadvantaged (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969), 26–57.Google Scholar
- 10.Barry R. Chiswick, “Guidelines for the Reform of Immigration Policy,” in ed., William Fellner,Essays in Contemporary Economic Problems(Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1981), 309–47.Google Scholar
- 14.George Gilder, Wealth and Poverty (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 12.Google Scholar
- 16.Martin Kilson, “Black Social Classes and Intergenerational Poverty,” Public Interest, 64 (Summer 1981): 61.Google Scholar