Recent Results from Mark-J at Petra

  • José Salicio


We can test the Standard Electroweak Theory1 at high center of mass energies and at high q2 by studying e+e- interactions at the colliding beam facility PETRA at DESY. The initial state is clean since only point-like particles are involved. The dynamics of the reactions e+e- → f \(\bar f\), where f can be an e, μ, τ, or a quark, can be studied, providing the tools to check the theory.


Pair Production Fragmentation Function Charge Asymmetry Flavor Change Neutral Current Axial Vector Coupling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S.L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1968).Google Scholar
  2. A. Salam and J.C. Ward, Phys. Lett. 13, 168 (1964).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967), and Phys. Rev. D5, 1412 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog, of Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 3.
    V. Barber and S. Pakvasa, Phys. Lett. 81B, 195 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 4.
    G.L. Kane and M.C. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. B195, 29 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 5.
    R.D. Field and R.P. Feynman, Nucl. Phys. B136, 1 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Ali, DESY-Report 81 - 016 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D17, 171 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Peterson, D. Schlatter, I. Schmitt, P.M. Zerwas, Phys. Rev. D27, 105 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 7.
    F.A. Berends and R. Kleiss, DESY-Reports 80/66 and 80/73.Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    F.A. Berends, K.F.J. Gaemers, and R. Gastmans, Nucl. Phys. B63, 361 (1973), Nucl. Phys. B68, 541 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    M. Pohl, MARK-J Internal Note.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    L.W. Mo, Contr. to Neutrino 80, Erice (1980).Google Scholar
  15. M. Roos and I. Liede, Phys. Lett. 82B, 89 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. F.W. Buesser, Proc. of Neutrino 81, Wailea, Hawaii (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    R. Bhattacharya, J. Smith and G. Grammer, Phys. Rev. D15, 3267 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 12.
    J. Smith, J.A.M. Vermaseren and G. Grammer, Phys. Rev. D15, 3280 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 13.
    M. Defrise, Zeitschr. f. Phys. C, Particles and Fields, 9, 41 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Defrise, S.Ong, J. Silva, C. Carimalo, Phys. Rev. D23, 663 (1981).Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    S.M. Berman, J.D. Bjorken and J.B. Kogutt, Phys. Rev. D4, 3388 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 15.
    D.P. Barber et al., Phys. Report 63, 337 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 16.
    J.D. Jackson and D.L. Scharro, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B128, 13 (1975).Google Scholar
  24. 17.
    J.P. Leveille, Univ. of Michigan Preprint, UM-HE-81-11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Salicio
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Junta de Energia NuclearMadridSpain
  2. 2.Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYHamburgFed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations