Advertisement

A Capability-Demand Approach to the Aged in Technological Environments: A Case for Improved Task Analysis

  • Martin V. Faletti
  • M. Cherie Clark
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 24)

Abstract

The Symposium on Aging and Technological Advances considered a broad range of issues involving technological advances and the aging human, an apt choice considering that industrialized societies are being impacted upon by the conjunction of human aging and technological advance on an unprecedented scale. It appears clear that technology will continue to change how we live and work on a day to day basis. Whether these changes operate to our detriment, or advantage, as we age will depend on the extent to which the demands of technological environments can be reconciled with the capabilities which we as aged operators bring to our transactions with these environments. This discussion is focused primarily on the application of human factors research to the study of the aged user’s capabilities and its implications for design and application of technology to activities of daily living (ADL).

Keywords

Grip Force Task Analysis Environment Component Meal Preparation Power Grip 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, C. (1971). Toward empirical, practicable, comprehensive task taxonomy. Human Factors, 13, 229–236.Google Scholar
  2. Companion, M., Corso, C. (1977). Task taxonomy: Two ignored issues. Proceedings, 21st Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society, 358–361.Google Scholar
  3. Conger, A. J. (1980). Integration and generalization of Kappas for multiple raters. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drury, C., Coury B. (1982). Container and handle design for manual handling. In R. Easterby, K. Kroemer, D. Chaffin (Eds.), Anthropometry and biomechanics: Theory and application. New York: Plenum Press, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Light, R.J. (1971). Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Oborne, D.J. (1982). Ergonomics at work. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Rohles, F. (1983). Opening jars: An anthropometric study of the wrist-twisting strength of the elderly. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 1, October, 112–116.Google Scholar
  8. Taeuber, C. M. (1983). America in transition: An aging society. (U. S. Bureau of the Census, Current Populations Reports, Series P-23, No. 128). Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Wellens, A.R., Revert, R., Faletti, M.V. (1982). A videotape field observation system for behavioral research. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Miami.Google Scholar
  10. Woudson, W.E. (1981). Human factors design handbook. New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin V. Faletti
    • 1
  • M. Cherie Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Stein Gerontology InstituteMiami Jewish Home and Hospital for the AgedMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations