Summary
Risk assessment is an art that attempts to produce estimates of the probability of adverse effects for a particular exposure. Thus, a risk assessment may develop a series of probabilities for illness or death which could be associated with varying degrees of exposure to a substance such as an air pollutant, coffee, or the use of an automobile. The regulation of environmental toxicants is a difficult and complex procedure, burdened by scientific uncertainties that permit wide differences in the interpretation of scientific evidence. Two major components of a federal regulatory strategy for carcinogens involve the assessment of health risks from suspected carcinogens, and the regulatory processes that convert such estimates of risk into appropriate regulatory action. There are at least ten Public Laws in the United States that provide for the use of risk assessment. In some cases, risk assessment may be used to set Federal Standards; in others, state- and situation-specific regulations prevail. The probability of adverse health effects in relation to the extent of exposure is considered here, involving the analysis and f combination of epidemiological and other human data with animal effects data. Specific problems considered include the choice of data, combination of data, translation of data from experimental to actual settings, conversion of the results from animal experiments to human response, and the extrapolation of experimental results from high doses to estimated responses at low-ambient concentrations. The various methods used to consider such data in developing a risk assessment are considered. Frequently, there is disagreement about the best method to use for particular circumstances. Thus, there exists a great deal of uncertainty about risk assessments. Some knowledge of the extent of the uncertainty is important in interpreting risk assessment results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, R. A. (1980) Toward a more uniform federal strategy for the assessment and regulation of carcinogens. Report prepared for the Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D. C.
Ames, B. N. (1979) Identifying environmental chemicals causing mutations and cancer.Science204: 587 – 593.
Anderson, E. L. (1982) Quantitative methods in use in the United States to assess cancer risk. Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantitative Estimation of Risk to Human Health from Chemicals. Rome, Italy, July 12.
Barr, J. T. , D. H. Hughes, and R. C. Barnard (1981) The use of risk assessment in regulatory decision-making: Time for a review.Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1: 264 – 276.
Cornfield, J. (1977) Carcinogenic risk assessment. Science 198: 693 – 699.
Crouch, E. , and R. Wilson (1979) Interspecies comparison of carcinogenic potency.J. Toxicol. Environ. Health5:1095–1118, and appendices.
Crouch, E. , and R. Wilson (1981) Regulation of carcinogens.Risk Anal. 1:47–57, 59 – 66.
Krump, K. S. (1982) Methods for estimating human cancer risks from non-human data. Presented at EPRI WDrkshop on Risk Assessment for Toxic Substances, December 1 – 2.
Krump, K. S. (1983) An improved procedure for low-dose extrapolation. In C. R. Richmond, P. J. Walsh and E. D. Copenhaver, Eds.Health Risk Analysis, Proceedings of the Third Life Sciences Symposium. The Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 381 – 392.
Doll, R. , and R. Peto (1981) The causes o£ cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today.J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 66: 1191 – 1308.
Electric Power Research Institute (1981) Conference Proceedings: Environmental Risk Assessment. How new regulations will affect the utility industry. EPRI EA-2064, Palo Alto, California.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, The Delaney Clause, Section 409 (c) (3) (A).
Gaylor, D. W. (1979) The EDQ, study. Summary and conclusion.J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 3: 179 – 183.
Gori, G. B. (1980) The regulation of carcinogenic hazards. Science 208: 256 – 261.
Gori, G. B. (1982) Regulation of cancer-causing substances: Utopia or reality.Chem. Eng. News6: 25 – 32.
Horn, L. , J. Kaldor, and J. McCann (1983) A comparison of alternative measures of mutagenic potency in theSalmonella(Ames) test.Mutation Res. 109: 131 – 141.
Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group, Vfork Group on Risk Assessment (1979) Scientific bases for identification of potential carcinogens and estimation of risks.J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 63: 242.
Krewski, D. , and C. Brown (1981) Carcinogenic risk assessment: A guide to the literature.Biometrics37: 353 - 366.
Linsell, C. A. , and F. G. Peers (1977) Field studies on liver cell cancer, InOrigins of Human Cancer, H. H. Hiatt et al. , Eds. , Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Mantel, N. , and M. Schneiderman (1975) Estimating “safe” levels. A hazardous undertaking.Cancer Res. 35: 1379 – 1386.
Maugh, T. H. (1978) Chemical carcinogens: How dangerous are low doses?Science202: 37 – 41.
McCann, J. , L. Horn, G. Litton, J. Kaldor, R. Magaw, L. Bernstein, and M. Pike (1983) Short-term tests for carcinogens and mutagens: A data base designed for comparative quantitative analysis, InStructure Activity as a Predictive Tool in Toxicology.Fundamentals, Methods, and Applications. , L. Goldberg, Ed. , Hemisphere Press, D. C. , pp. 229 – 240.
Munro, I. C. , and D. R. Krewski (1981) Risk assessment and regulatory decisionmaking.Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 19: 549 – 560.
National Academy of Sciences, Food Protection Committee, Food and Nutrition Board (1970) Evaluating the safety of food chemicals. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
National Academy of Sciences, Commission on Natural Resources (1975)Pest control: An assessment of present and alternative technologies. Vol. 1,Contemporary pest control practices and prospects. The Report of the Executive Committee, Washington, D. C.
National Academy of Sciences, Committee for a Study on Saccharin andFood Safety Policy (1979) Food safety policy: Scientific and social considerations. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
National Academy of Sciences, Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (1980)The effects on populations of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
National Academy of Sciences, Committee onRisk and Decision Making (1982) Risk and decision making: perspectives and research. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
National Academy of Sciences, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health (1983)Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (19980) Final rule: Identification, classification, and regulation of potential occupational carcinogens. Fed. Reg. 45:5001.
Office of Science and Technology Policy/ Regulatory Wbrk Group on Science and Technology, Executive Office of the President (October 1, 1982 )Potential human carcinogens: Methods for identification and characterization. Part 1: Current Views: Discussion Draft.
Office of Technology Assessment (1981) Assessment of the technologies for determining cancer risks from the environment. Washington, D. C.
Peto, R. , M. Pike, L. Bernstein, L. S. Gold, and B. Ames (1984) The TD: A proposed general convention for the numerical description of the carcinogenic potency of chemicals in chronic-exposure animal experiments.Enivron. Health Perspectives(submitted).
Ricci, P. F. , and L. S. Molton (1981) Risk and benefit in environmental law.Science214: 1096 – 1100.
Saffiotti, U. (1980) The problem of extrapolating from observed carcinogenic effects to estimates of risk for exposed populations.J. Tox. & Environ. Health6: 1309 – 1326
Sontag, J. M. , M. P. Page, and U. Saffiotti (1976) Guidelines for carcinogenic bioassay in small rodents. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Squire, R. A. (1981) Ranking animal carcinogens: A proposed regulatory approach.Science214: 877 – 880.
Tomatis, L. , et al. (1978) Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of chemicals: A review of the monograph program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer,Cancer Res. 38: 877 – 885.
Weisburger, J. H. , and G. M. Williams (1980) Carcinogen testing: Current problems and new approaches.Science214: 401 – 407.
Weisburger, J. H. , and G. M. Williams (1981) The decision-point approach for systematic carcinogen testing.Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 19: 561 – 566.
Whittemore, A. S. (1982) Estimating human risks from animal data. Presented at EPRI Workshop on Risk Assessment for Toxic Substances, Carmel, California. December 1–2 (unpublished).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newell, G.W. (1984). The Role of Risk Assessment in Regulatory Decisions in the United States. In: Chu, E.H.Y., Generoso, W.M. (eds) Mutation, Cancer, and Malformation. Environmental Science Research, vol 31. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2399-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2399-0_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9463-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2399-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive