Skip to main content

Social Interdependence and Decision Making

  • Chapter
Behavioral Decision Making

Abstract

When we think about social interdependence and decision making we often tend to think about game theory in contrast to decision theory. Game theory, after all, is the analysis of decision making and strategic planning in environments that are not neutral or indifferent to our goals and actions. These environments consist of others who have their own plans, intentions, and strategies, and of others with whom we must effectively cope to be effective decision makers. Game theory is limited, however, in that is normally begins with assumptions about the preferences of the persons involved, about what the persons know about each other, and about the form of the interdependence that exists among the participants. It does not deal with the problem of how the preferences came about in the first place, for example, or the conditions under which people will opt to change the nature of their interdependence. These two issues are the two foci of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., McGinn, N. C., & Susmilch, C. (1980). Internal standards revisited: Effect of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. J. (1975). Game theory and politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. J. (1976). Paradoxes in politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1983). Approval voting. Boston: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, A. (1982). Game theory and experimental games. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. C., & Guyer, M. J. (1980). Social traps. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D., Suppes, P., & Siegel, S. (1957). Decision making: An experimental approach. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. (1969). Group performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A. (1954). Theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, H. (1979). Games as models of social phenomena. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin. G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation. Developmental Psychology, 11, 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. A. (1972). Promotive tension: The basis of prosocial behavior from a Lewinian perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. A. (1976). Cruelty and kindness. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1134–1146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Murray, A. (1983). Distributive justice and unfair exchange. In D. M. Messick & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Equity theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C. G., Messick, D. M., Kuhlman, D. M., & Campos, F. T. (1973). Motivational bases of choice in three-choice decomposed games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messé, L. A., & Watts, B. L. (1983). Complex nature of the sense of fairness: Internal standards and social comparison as bases for reward evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M. (1972). A stochastic model of preference in decomposed games. In Sauermann, H. (Ed.), Contributions to experimental economics (Vol. 3 ). Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 11–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). (1983). Equity theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1983a). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In D. M. Messick & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Equity theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1983b). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Thorngate, W. (1967). Relative gain maximizations in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F., & Nogee, P. (1951). An experimental measurement of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 59, 371–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R., Lui, L., Messick, C., Messick, D. M., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R., Samuelson, C., & Wilke, H. (1983). A computer laboratory for studying resource dilemmas. Behavioral Science, 28, 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1967). Social evaluation theory: Convergence and applications. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatt, J. Social traps. (1973). American Psychologist, 28, 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H. T. (1983). A proposal for elections ( Review of Approval voting). Science, 221, 450–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1973). An introduction to positive political theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1957). Level of aspiration and decision making. Psychological Review, 64, 253–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Work originally published in 1759 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S., Lumsdaine, A., Lumsdaine, M., William, R., Smith, M., Janis, I., Star, S., & Cot- trell, L. (1949). The American soldier. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1977). Social comparison processes. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Avermaet, E. (1974). Equity: A theoretical and experimental analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Messick, D.M. (1985). Social Interdependence and Decision Making. In: Wright, G. (eds) Behavioral Decision Making. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9460-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2391-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics