Skip to main content

Education and Decision Theory A Personal View

  • Chapter
Behavioral Decision Making
  • 536 Accesses

Abstract

First of all, in the grand tradition—and spirit—of Murphy, Parkinson, and Sod, I want to offer you a law: the “law of disciplinary myopia.” It goes like this: Each academic discipline possesses a limited number of key insights into the world and how we can come to know and understand it better. The number is usually greater than one but rarely more than two or three. These key insights are documented, embroidered, stretched, qualified, and paraphrased until they are all but lost to many students, even specialists (perhaps most of all specialists). But that is not the law of disciplinary myopia, just an academic manifestation of Parkinson. The law of disciplinary myopia says that in its own operations (organization and teaching), a discipline will ignore, deny, and betray its own key insights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dowie, J. (1982, July). The catch .22 of utility theory. Paper presented to Health Economists Study Group, Brunei University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, J., & Lefrere, P. (1984). Probabilistic responses to multiple-choice tests. In E. S. Henderson & M. B. Nathenson (Eds.), Independent learning in higher education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S. (1983, January). The weighting of examination components. (Notes in Decision Theory No. 117). University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. C., & McFadden, W. (1980). Experiences with MAUD: Aiding decision structuring versus bootstrapping the decision-maker. Acta Psychologica, 45, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. H. (1973). A new vector partition of the probability score. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 12, 595–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poizner, S. B., Nicewander, A., & Gettys, C. F. (1978). Alternative response and scoring methods for multiple choice items: An empirical study of probabilistic and ordinal response modes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, R. C., & Brunza, J. J. (1975). Effects of a confidence-weighted scoring system on measures of test reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rippey, R. M., & Voytovich, A. E. (1982). Adjusting confidence tests for realism: The favorable consequences. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 5, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rippey, R. M., & Voytovich, A. E. (1983). Linking knowledge, realism and diagnostic reasoning by computer-assisted confidence testing. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 9, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. F. (1982). External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 30, 132–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dowie, J. (1985). Education and Decision Theory A Personal View. In: Wright, G. (eds) Behavioral Decision Making. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9460-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2391-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics