Process Control and Quality Control

  • Philip K. Freakley

Abstract

Quality control has traditionally been concerned with the setting of standards which must be maintained at each stage of manufacture, followed by the manual monitoring of process supplies, operations, and products, to check if the specified standards are being maintained. In contrast, process control has been almost entirely concerned with the design and performance of systems for maintaining machine conditions and controlling machine operations. However, both quality control and process control have the common objective of enabling products which are acceptable to the customer to be produced at a cost which ensures both a competitive price and a viable profit margin.

Keywords

Fatigue Nickel Quartz Attenuation Platinum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Juran, J. M.,Quality Control Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirkpatrick, E. G.,Quality Control for Managers and Engineers, Wiley, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM D2414, “Dibutyl Phthalate Absorption Number,” (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turi, E. A.,Thermal Characterisation of Polymeric Materials, Academic Press, London (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mawer, J. J.,Rub. Chem. Technol.42, 110 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ASTM D445, “Kinematic Viscosity of Transparent and Opaque Liquids,” (1979).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, R. P.,Handbook of Plastics Test Methods, 2nd ed., Godwin, London (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    King, D., “Training within the Organisation: A Study of Company Policy and Procedures for the Systematic Training of Operators and Supervisoes,” Tavistock, London (1964).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Currie, R. M.,Work Study, 3rd ed., Pitman, London (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mundel, M. E.,Motion and Time Study: Principles and Practice, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., (1970).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cox, D. R.,Planning of Experiments, Wiley, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies, O. L.,The Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments, ICI ( Oliver and Boyd ), London (1971).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keppel, G., and W. H. Saufley,Introduction to Design and Analysis, Freeman, San Francisco (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Low, C. W.,Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs.42, 334 (1964).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spendley, W., G. R. Hext, and F. R. Himsworth,Technometrics 4(4), 441 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker, R. J., and J. A. Nelder,The Glim System—Release 3 Manual, Numerical AlgorithmsGroup and Royal Statistical Society, London (1977).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Box, G. E. P., and K. B. Wilson,J. Rub. Statist. Soc. B 13, 1 (1957).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Box, G. E. P., and J. S. Hunter,Ann. Math. Statist. 28, 195 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Derringer, G. C.,Rub. Age 104, 27 (1972).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Box, G. E. P., and D. W. Behnken,Technometrics 2(4), 455 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    . Edwards, A. L.,Multiple Regression and the Analysis of Variance and Covariance, Freeman, San Francisco (1979).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Statistical Tables, from White, J., A. Yeats and G. Skipworth,Tables for Statisticians, 2nd Ed., Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham, UK (1977).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Buxton, J. R., and M. Holt, Paper given at Royal Statistical Society Conference,Regression Modelling and Data, Sheffield, England (March 1983).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buxton, J. R., and M. Holt, Internal report, Engineering Maths. Department, Loughborough University, U.K. (1982).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldsmith, P. L., Paper given at the Royal Statistical Society Conference, Warwick University (March 1974).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haslam, J. A., G. R. Summers, and D. Williams,Engineering Instrumentation and Control, Arnold, London (1981).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones, B. E.,Instrumentation, Measurement and Feedback, McGraw-Hill, London (1977).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Groover, M. P.,Automation, Production Systems and Computer Aided Manufacturing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1980).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kane-May, Company Literature, Welwyn Garden City, U.K. (1982).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heimann, Company Literature, Wiesbaden-Doteheim, West Germany (1982).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barnes, Company Literature, Stamford, Connecticut (1982).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vanzetti, Company Literature, Stoughton, Massachusetts (1982).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luxtron, Company Literature, Mountain View, California (1982).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carter Bros., Company Literature, Rochdale, U.K. (1982).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dynisco, Company Literature, Westwood, Massachusetts (1982).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gentron Company Literature, Gentron, Sunnyvale, California (1983).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kistler Company Literature, Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland (1981).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Willshaw, H.,Calenders for Rubber Processing, Institute of Rubber Industry Monograph, London (1956).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Measurex Company Literature, Cupertino, California (1980).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hamblin, D. J.,Manufacturing and Management and Control Systems in the UK Polymer Processing Industry, SERC, Polymer Engineering Directorate Report (November 1982).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    B.S. 2564, “Control Chart Technique When Manufacturing to a Specification,” (1955).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Young, R. E.,Supervisory Remote Control Systems, Peter Peregrinus, Stevenage, U.K. (1977).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Landau, Y. D.,Adaptive Control—The Model Reference Approach, Marcel Dekker, New York (1979).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Starr, M. K.,Production Management: Systems and Synthesis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1972).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    United States Department of Defence, Military Standard, Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection 27 Attributes (Mil-STD-105D), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1963).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    B.S. 6001, “Specification of Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes,” (1972).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ott, E. R.,Process Quality Control, McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha, Tokyo (1975).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    United States Department of Defense, Military Standard, Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Defective (MIL-STD-414), U.S. Gover- nement Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip K. Freakley
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Polymer TechnologyLoughborough University of TechnologyLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations