Diagnostic strategy for adult soft tissue sarcomas

  • David E. Markham
Part of the Cancer Treatment and Research book series (CTAR, volume 29)


Accurate histological diagnosis, coupled with a detailed knowledge of the local extent of the tumour along with it’s spread to more distant parts, is essential for the efficient overall management of soft tissue sarcomas. Whilst other methods of treatment are available for temporary control of these tumours, surgery remains the most effective method. The local extent of the tumour must be accurately determined. Imaging techniques are important in this respect and must be used before histological biopsy. Their results, in addition to being more accurate and less prone to misinterpretation before biopsy, may indicate other essential investigations which are necessary before definitive biopsy is undertaken. This chapter will detail a diagnostic strategy for the evaluation behaviour of the tumour and will include a medical history and physical examination, scintigraphy, conventional and computered imaging, arteriorgraphy and surgical biopsy.


Definitive Surgery Biopsy Incision Freeze Section Analysis Regional Lymph Node Involvement Local Extent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Enneking W. F., Spanier S. S. and Malawer M. M.: The effect of the anatomic setting on the results of surgical procedures for soft parts sarcoma of the thigh. Cancer 47: 1005–1022, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenberg S. A., Suit H. D., Baker L. H. and Rosen G.: Sarcomas of the soft tissue and bone. In: Cancer (de Vita V. T., Hellman S. and Rosenberg S. A., eds) p. 1036, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weingrad D. N. and Rosenberg S. A.: Early lymphatic spread of osteogenic and soft-tissue sarcomas. Surgery 84: 231–240, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindell M. M., Wallace S., de Santos L. A. and Bernardino M. E.: Diagnostic technique for the evaluation of the soft tissue sarcoma. Semin. Oncol. 8: 160–171, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernardino M. E., Jing B., Thomas J. L., Lindell M. M., Zornoza J.: The extremity soft-tissue lesion: a comparative study of ultrasound, computed tomography and xeroradiography. Radiology 139: 53–59, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Santos L. A., Goldstein H. M., Murray J. A. and Wallace S.: Computed tomography in the evaluation of musculoskeletal neoplasm. Radiology 128: 89–94, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berger P. E. and Kuhn J. P.: Computed tomography of tumors of the musculoskeletal system in children. Radiology 127: 171–175, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hudson T. M., Haas G. H., Enneking W. F. and Hawkins I. F.: Angiography in the management of musculoskeletal tumors. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 141: 11–21, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pass H. I., Dwyer A., Makuch R. and Roth J. A.: Detection of pulmonary metastases in patients with osteogenic and soft-tissue sarcomas: The superiority of CT-scans compared with conventional linear tomograms using dynamic analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 3: 1261–1265, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Markham

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations