Advertisement

Phenytoin, Transmitter Release and Calcium Flux

  • Jonathan Pincus
Part of the Topics in the Neurosciences book series (TNSC, volume 1)

Abstract

Most of the major anticonvulsants including phenytoin, phenobarbital and carbamazepine are known to have presynaptic actions that affect evoked transmitter release (1–6). Most of these substances also have postsynaptic actions. In the case of phenytoin, the presynaptic actions are of special interest because it has long been held that the depression or elimination by phenytoin of post-tetanic potentiation is the experimental analog of its anticonvulsant properties (7) and post tetanic potentiation is very much a result of presynaptic effects (8). We have studied the actions of phenytoin at the neuromuscular synapse and found that its actions there were complex and were dependent on the calcium concentration of the external media (5–7). In normal media containing 1.8mM calcium, phenytoin inhibited evoked release. In low calcium (0.2mM) media, the drug increased evoked release. The drug was found to increase spontaneous release, which is to say it increased the frequency of miniature endplate potentials (mepps), irrespective of the calcium concentration of the media. In normal media it did so and in media containing no added calcium but with EGTA it also increased mepp frequency. To explain these differing effects, it was suggested that phenytoin reduced calcium influx during stimulation and also inhibited some portion of the calcium sequestration or extrusion process.

Keywords

Transmitter Release Acetylcholine Release Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer Neuromuscular Synapse Krebs Ringer Bicarbonate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson T.D. and Turkanis S.A. (1973). Barbiturate induced transmitter release at a frog neuromuscular junction. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 48, 48–58.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Proctor W.R. and Weakly J.N. (1976). A comparison of the presynaptic and postsynaptic actions of pentobarbitone and phenobarbitone in the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J. Physiol. 258, 257–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pincus J.H., Insler N.F. (1981). Barbiturates and transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. Brain Res. 213, 127–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yaari Y., Pincus J.H. and Argov Z. (1977). Inhibition of synaptic transmission by diphenylhydantoin. Ann. Neurol. 1, 334–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pincus J.H., Yaari Y. and Argov Z. (1980). Phenytoin: Electrophysiological effects at the neuromuscular junction. Adv. Neurol.363–376.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yaari Y., Pincus J.H. and Argov Z. (1979). Phenytoin and transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. Brain Res. 160, 479–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Esplin D.W. (1957). Effects of diphenylhydantoin on synaptic transmission in cat spinal cord and stellate ganglion. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 120, 301–323.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lev-Tov A. and Rahamimoff R. (1980). A study of tetanic and post-tetanic potentiation of miniature endplate potentials at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. 309, 247–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pincus J.H. and Weinstein H. (1984). Acetylcholine release from synaptosomes and phenytoin action. Brain Res. 296, 313–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alnaes E. and Rahamimoff R. (1975). On the role of mitochondria in transmitter release from motor nerve terminals. J. Physiol. 248, 287–306.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mullins L.J. (1979). The generation of electric currents in cardiac fibers by Na/Ca exchange. Am. J. Physiol. 263, C103–C110.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rahamimoff R., Erulkar S.D., Lev-Tov A. and Melri H. (1978). Intracellular and extracellular calcium ions in transmitter release at the neuromuscular synapse. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 307, 583–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pincus J.H. (1972). Diphenylhydantoin and ion flux in lobster nerves. Arch. Neurol. 26, 4–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lipicky R.J., Gilbert D.L. and Stillman I.M. (1972). Diphenylhydantoin inhibition of sodium conductance in squid giant axon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 69, 1758–1760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pincus J.H. and Hsiao K. (1981). Phenytoin inhibits both synaptosomal 45Ca uptake and efflux. Exp. Neurol. 74, 293–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pincus J.H. and Hsiao K. (1981). Calcium uptake mechanisms affected by some convulsant and anticonvulsant drugs. Brain Res. 217, 119–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blaustein M.P. and Oborn C.J. (1975). The influence of sodium on calcium fluxes in pinched-off nerve terminals in vitro. J. Physiol. 247, 657–686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krnjevic K. (1974). In: Molecular Mechanisms in General Anaesthesia. M.J. Halsey, R. Millar and J.A. Sutton, Eds., Churchill Livingston, N.Y.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carlen P.L., Gurevich N. and Durand D. (1982). Ethanol in low doses augments calcium mediated mechanisms measured intracellularly in hippocampal neurons. Science 215, 306–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nicoll R.A. and Madison D.V. (1982). General anaesthetics hyperpolarize neurones in the vertebrate central nervous system. Science 217, 1055–1057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Pincus

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations