Routine Management of Myocardial Infarction



Recent changes in the routine management of patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction (MI) over a 10-year period have been highlighted in a publication that surveyed general and family practitioners, internists, and cardiologists in the United States [1]. This survey revealed that half the myocardial infarcts were regarded as uncomplicated. Because intensive or coronary care facilities were widely available in both metropolitan and rural areas, more than 90 per cent of physicians routinely hospitalized their patients. Between 1970 and 1979, the use of intensive care and coronary care facilities increased and the availability of progressive care facilities rose from 33 to 75 per cent.


Acute Myocardial Infarction Nitrous Oxide Beta Blocker Coronary Care Unit Routine Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wenger NK, Hellerstein HK, Blackburn H, Cas-tranova SJ: Physician practice in the management of patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction: Changes in the past decade. Circulation 65: 421–427, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pantridge JF, Geddes JS: A mobile intensive-care unit in the management of myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 271, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pantridge JF, Adgey AAJ: Pre-hospital coronary care: The mobile coronary care unit. Am J Car-diol 24: 666–673, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adgey AAJ, Allen JD, Geddes JS, James RGG, Webb SW, Zaidi SA, Pantridge JF: Acute phase of myocardial infarction. Lancet 11: 501–504, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuller L, Lilienfeld A, Fisher R: Epidemiological study of sudden and unexpected deaths due to arteriosclerotic heart disease. Circulation 34: 1056–1068, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson RG, Hallstrom AP, Cobb LA: Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the management of ventricular fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 90: 737–740, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cobb LA, Alvarez H, Kopass MK: A rapid response system for out-of-hospital cardiac emergencies. Med Clin N Am 60: 283–290, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lund I, Skulberg A: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by lay people. Lancet 11: 702–705, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liberthson RR, Nagel EL, Hirschman JC, Nus-senfeld SR: Pre-hospital ventricular defibrilla-tion: Prognosis and followup course. N Engl J Med 291: 317–321, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis RP, Lanese RR, Stang JM, Chirikos TN, Keller MD, Warren JV: Reduction of mortality from pre-hospital myocardial infarction by prudent patient activity of mobile coronary care system. Am Heart J 103: 123–130, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cobb LA: Pre-hospital cardiac cure: Does it make a difference. Am Heart J 103: 316–318, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas M, Malcrona R, Fillmore S, et al: Haemodynamic effects of morphine in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 27: 863–875, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weil JV, McCullough RF, Kline JS, Sodal IE: Diminished ventilatory response to hypoxia and hypercapnia after morphine in normal man. N Engl J Med 292: 1103–1106, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alderman EL, Barry WH, Graham AF, Harrison DC: Hemodynamic effects of morphine and pentazocine differ in cardiac patients. N Engl J Med 287: 623–627, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kerr F: Nitrous oxide analgesia in myocardial infarction. Lancet 1: 63–66, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parbrook G: Therapeutic uses of nitrous oxide. Br J Anaestb 40: 365–371, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson P, Lown B: Nitrous oxide as an analgesic in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 235: 924–927, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wynne J, Mann T, Alpert JS, Green LH, Grossman W: Hemodynamic effects of nitrous oxide administered during cardiac catheterization. JAMA 243: 1440–1443, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lie K.I. Wellens HJ, van Capelle FJ, Durrer D: Lidocaine in the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 291: 1324–1326, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chalmers TC, Matta RJ, Smith H., Kunzler AM: Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 297: 1091–1096, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Selzer A: Use of anticoagulant agents in acute myocardial infarction: Statistics or clinical judgment. Am J Cardiol 41: 1315–1317, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goldman L, Feinstein AR: Anticoagulants and myocardial infarction. The problems of pooling: Drowning and floating. Ann Intern Med 90: 92–94, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Deykin D: Current status of anticoagulant therapy. Am J Med 72: 659–664, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitchell JRA: Anticoagulants in coronary heart disease: Retrospect and prospect. Lancet 1: 257–262, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Asinger RW, Mikell FL, Elsperger J, et al: Incidence of left-ventricular thrombosis after acute transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 305: 297–302, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weinrich DJ, Burke JF, Jo Pauletto F: Left ventricular mural thrombi complicating acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 100: 789–794, 1984.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Visser CA, et al: Embolic potential of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: A two-dimensional echocardiographic study of 119 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 5: 1276–1280, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ezekowitz MD, et al: Comparison of indium-111 platelet scintigraphy and two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular thrombi. N Engl J Med 306: 1509–1513, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nordrehaug JE, Johannessen K-A, Von der Lippe G: Usefulness of high dose anticoagulant in preventing left ventricular thrombus in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 55: 1491–1493, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kramer P, et al: Lysis of left ventricular thrombi with urokinase. Circulation 72: 112–118, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anticoagulants in acute myocardial infarction. Results of a cooperative clinical trial. JAMA 225: 724–729, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sixty Plus Reinfarction Group: A double-blind trial to assess long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients after myocardial infarction, Lancet 11: 989–994, 1980.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Spicer J: The psychological impact of myocardial infarction. Technical Report No. 19: National Heart Foundation of New Zealand. Editor: Dr. D.R. Hay.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hackett TP, Cassem NH, Wishnie A: The coronary care unit: An appraisal of its psychologic hazards. N Engl J Med 279: 1365–1370, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ford AB, Hellerstein HK: Work and heart disease. I. A psychologic study in the factory. Circulation 18: 823–832, 1958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ford AB, Hellerstein HK, Turell DJ: Work and heart disease. II. A psychologic study in a steel mill. Circulation 20: 537, 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Naughton J, Sevelius G, Balke B: Physiological responses of normal and pathological subjects to a modified work capacity test. J Sports Med 3: 201, 1953.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Markiewicz W, Houston N, De Busk RF: Exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction. Circulation 56: 26–31, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Theroux P, Waters DD, Halphen C, Debaisieux JC, Mizgala HF: Prognostic value of exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 301: 341–345, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Davidson DM, De Busk RF: Prognostic value of a single exercise test 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Circulation 61: 236–242, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smith JW, Dennis CA, Grassman A, et al: Exercise testing three weeks after myocardial infarction. Chest 75: 12, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sami M, Kraemer D, De Busk RF: The prognostic significance of serial exercise testing after myocardial infarction. Circulation 60: 1238–1246, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schulze RA Jr, Strauss HW, Pitt B: Sudden death in the year following myocardial infarction. Relation to ventricular premature contractions in the late hospital phase and left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Med 62: 192–199, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weld FM, Bigger JT: Risk stratification by exercise testing and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram 2 weeks after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 58(Suppl II): 11–198, 1978.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Taylor GJ, O’Neal Humphries J, Mellits ED, Pitt B, Schulze RA, Griffith LSC, Achuff SC: Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 62: 960–970, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Goldschlager N: Treadmill exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction. Cardiovas Rev Rep 1: 397–402, 1980.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    De Feyter PJ, van Eenige MJ, Dighton DH, Visser FC, De Jong J, Roos JP: Prognostic value of exercise testing, angiography and left ven-triculography 6 to 8 weeks after myocardial infarction. Circulation 66: 527–536, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lewis JA, Ellis SH: A statistical appraisal of postinfarction beta-blocker trials. Primary Car-diol. Suppl 1, 1982, pages 31–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiovascular DivisionBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.CardiologistGreen Lane HospitalAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations