Skip to main content

Cognitive Assessment in the Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Head-Injured Adults

  • Chapter
Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention

Abstract

The evaluation of the brain-injured client can be a complex endeavor, requiring an analysis of sensorimotor, cognitive, and interpersonal functioning as they are affected by a lesion or disease process. Often neuropsychological assessment is used to establish a differential diagnosis between “organic” and “psychological” etiologies, or to localize and/or lateralize the cerebral basis of disturbed psychological functioning. The neuropsychological evaluation may also be used to describe the client’s extra-assessment behavior and to predict relative success or disability in social, vocational, or educational roles. Only recently has neuropsychological assessment acquired an additional role: that of assessing a client’s functioning to aid in the development of treatment plans for the remediation of cognitive disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Spreen, O. & Tuokko, A.T. 1982. The neuropsychological assessment of normal and disordered cognition. In R.N. Malatesha & L.D. Hartlage (Eds.), Neuropsychology and cognition, Vol. I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 63–112.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lezak, M.D. 1983. Neuropsychological assessment ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reitan, R.M. & Davison, L.A. (Eds.) 1974. Clinical neuropsychology: current status and applications. New York: Winston-Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Golden, C.J., Hammeke, T.A. & Purisch, A.D. 1980. The Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery: manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luria, A.R. 1980. Higher cortical functions in man (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, A.L. 1979. Luria’s neuropsychological investigation: text, manual, and test cards ( 2nd ed. ). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Milberg, W.P., Kaplan, E. & Hebben, N. 1986. The Boston process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In I. Grant & K.M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment in neuropsychiatrie disorders: clinical methods and empirical findings. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein, G. 1984. Methodological and theoretical issues in neuropsychological assessment. In B.A. Edelstein & E.T. Couture (Eds.), Behavioral assessment and rehabilitation of the traumatically brain-damaged. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch, W.J. 1982. Neuropsychological assessment of brain behavior relationships: an introduction. In L.E. Trexler (Ed.), Cognitive rehabilitation: conceptualization and intervention. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch, W.J. 1983. Neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. In C.J. Golden & P.J. Vicente (Eds.), Foundations of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 189–214.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lynch, W.J. 1984. A rehabilitation program for brain-injured adults. In B.A. Edelstein & E.T. Couture (Eds.), Behavioral assessment and rehabilitation of the traumatically brain-damaged. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 273–312.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borkowski, J.G. & Cavanaugh, J.C. 1979. Maintenance and generalization of skills and strategies by the retarded. In W.R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: psychological theory and research ( 2nd ed. ). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gagné, R.M. 1984. Learning outcomes and their effects. Am. Psychol. 39, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lezak, M.D. 1984. An individualized approach to neuropsychological assessment. In P.E. Logue & J.M. Schear (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: a multidisciplinary approach. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, pp. 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levin, H.S., Benton, A.L. & Grossman, R.G. 1982. Neurobehavioral consequences of closed head injury. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, E. 1984. Recovery and management of neuropsychological impairments. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glaser, R. & Nitko, J.J. 1971. Measurement in learning and instruction. In R.L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luria, A.R. 1963. Restoration offunction after brain injury. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luria, A.R., Naydin, V.L., Tsvetkova, L.S. & Vinarskaya, E.N. 1969. Restoration of higher cortical function following local brain damage. In P.J. Vinken & G.W. Bruyn (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, pp. 368–433.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glaser, R. 1976. Cognitive psychology and instructional design. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Resnick, L.B. 1976. Task analysis in instructional design: some cases from mathematics. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson, J.H. 1958. Evolution and dissolution of the nervous system. In J. Taylor (Ed.), Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson, Vol. 2. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Greenfield, P.M. 1984. A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan, H.S. 1954. The psychiatric interview. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Christensen, A.L. 1985. The process of neuropsychological investigation and the relevance for patient functioning. Presented at the Symposium, “Neuropsychology and Intervention: Towards Valid Decisions” (B.P. Uzzell, organizer), INS meeting, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kaplan, E. 1983. Process and achievement revisited. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Toward a holistic developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, pp. 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan, E. 1983. Process and achievement revisited. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Toward a holistic developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, pp. 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brown, A.L. & French, L.A. 1979. The zone of potential development: implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000. Intelligence 3, 255–273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Campione, J.C. & Brown, A.L. 1984. Learning ability and transfer propensity as sources of individual differences in intelligence. In P.H. Brooks, R. Sperber & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, pp. 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Campione, J.C., Brown, A.L. & Bryant, N.R. 1985. Individual differences in learning and memory. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: an information-processing approach. New York: W.H. Freeman, pp. 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Budoff, M. & Corman, L. 1976. Effectiveness of a learning potential procedure in improving problem-solving skills of retarded and nonretarded children. Am. J. Ment. Defic. 81, 260–264.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Feuerstein, R. 1979. The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: the learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., Gerstman, L. & Gordon, W. 1970. Relationship between initial competence and ability to profit from cues in brain-damaged individuals. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 75, 248–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Day, J.D. 1983. The zone of proximal development. In M. Pressley & J.R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: psychological foundations. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. [M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (Eds.)] Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lezak, M.D. 1982a. Assessing initiative, planning, and executive capabilities. In G.A. Broe & R.L. Tate (Eds.), Brain impairment. Sydney: The Postgraduate Committee in Medicine of the University of Sydney, pp. 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lezak, M.D. 1982b. The problem of assessing executive functions. Int. J. Psychol. 17, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Brooks, N. 1984. Cognitive deficits after head injury. In N. Brooks (Ed.), Closed head injury: psychological, social, and family consequences. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–73.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Goldstein, K. & Scheerer, M. 1941. Abstract and concrete behavior: an experimental study with special tests. Psychological Monographs (Whole No. 239) 53, 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Luria, A.R. 1973. The frontal lobes and the regulation of behavior. In K.H. Pribram & A.R. Luria (Eds.), Psychophysiology of the frontal lobes. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Damasio, A.R. 1985. The frontal lobes. In K.M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–375.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Konow, A. & Pribram, K.H. 1970. Error recognition and utilization produced by injury to the frontal cortex in man. Neuropsychologia 8, 489–491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shallice, T. 1982. Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, B298, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Belmont, J.M., Butterfield, E.C. & Ferretti, R.P. 1982. To secure transfer of training, instruct self-management skills. In D.K. Detterman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), How and how much can intelligence be increased? Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Malee, J. 1984. Training the brain-injured client in behavioral self-management skills. In B.A. Edelstein & E.T. Couture (Eds.), Behavioral assessment and rehabilitation of the traumatically brain-damaged. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 121–150.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Buschke, H. 1984. Control of cognitive processing. In L.R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Butterfield, E.C. & Belmont, J.M. 1977. Assessing and improving the executive cognitive functions of mentally retarded people. In I. Bialer & M. Sternlicht (Eds.), The psychology of mental retardation. New York: Psychological Dimensions, pp. 277–318.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Das, J.P. 1980. Planning: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Psychol. Res. 41, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Das, J.P. & Heemsbergen, D.B. 1983. Planning as a factor in the assessment of cognitive processes. J. of Psychoeduc. Assess. 1, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Das, J.P. & Jarman, R.F. 1981. Coding and planning processes. In M.P. Friedman, J.P. Das & N. O’Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and learning. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shallice, T. 1981. Neurological impairment of cognitive processes. B. Med. Bull. 37, 187–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chi, M.T.H. & Glaser, R. 1985. Problem-solving ability. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: an information-processing approach. New York: W.H. Freeman, pp. 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K.H. 1960. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Boyd, T.M. & Sautter, S. 1985. Route finding by the head-injured: qualitative analysis of executive control in an everyday task. Presented at the 9th Annual Post-graduate Course on Rehabilitation of the Brain-Injured Adult and Child, Williamsburg, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Brown, A.L. 1978. Knowing when, where, and how to remember: a problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Meichenbaum, D., Burland, S., Gruson, L. & Cameron, R. 1979. Metacognitive assessment. Presented at the conference on the Growth of Insight, Wisconsin Research and Development Center, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sunderland, A., Harris, J.E. & Baddeley, A.D. 1984. Assessing everyday memory after severe head injury. In J.E. Harris & P.E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions, and absent- mindedness. London: Academic Press, pp. 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sunderland, A., Harris, J.E. & Gleave, J. 1984. Memory failures in everyday life following severe head injury. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 6, 127–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Herrman, D.J. 1984. Questionnaires about memory. In J.E. Harris & P.E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions and absent-mindedness. London: Academic Press, pp. 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shure, M. & Spivack, G. 1978. Problem-solving techniques in child rearing. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Brown, A.L. 1979. Theories of memory and the problems of development: activity, growth, and knowledge. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rogoff, B. & Gardner, W. 1984. Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gagné, R.M. & Beard, J.G. 1978. Assessment of learning outcomes. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advance in instructional psychology, Vol. 1. Hillsdale. NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gagné, R.M. & Beard, J.G. 1981. Assessment of learning outcomes. InJ.R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cohen, N.J. 1984. Preserved learning capacity in amnesia: evidence for multiple memory systems. In L.R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Cohen, N.J. & Squire, L.R. 1980. Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science 210, 207–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cicerone, K.D., Tupper, D.E. (1986). Cognitive Assessment in the Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Head-Injured Adults. In: Uzzell, B.P., Gross, Y. (eds) Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2291-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2291-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9412-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2291-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics