Advertisement

The Ecological Validity Of Neuropsychological Assessment and Remediation

  • Tessa Hart
  • Mary Ellen Hayden

Abstract

In its clinical applications, human neuropsychology is rooted historically in clinical neurology and in the psychometric tradition advanced by clinical psychology. Thus, practitioners of applied neuropsychology have been involved in diagnosing the presence and/or locus of injuries and diseases of the brain, using standardized methods adapted from those of clinical and experimental psychology. This traditional role provided a valuable adjunct to the clinical neurological examination in the days when brain-imaging techniques were either inaccurate or invasive. With the advent of new and sophisticated noninvasive methods such as the CT and PET scans and magnetic resonance techniques, the utility of clinical neuropsychology as a purely diagnostic discipline has been, and will continue to be, progressively diluted [1].

Keywords

Neuropsychological Assessment Ecological Validity Everyday Functioning Cognitive Remediation Memory Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Costa, L. 1983. Clinical neuropsychology: a discipline in evolution. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 5, 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brunswik, E. 1955. Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychol Rev. 62, 193–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heaton, R.K. & Pendleton, M.G. 1981. Use of neuropsychological tests to predict adult patients’ everyday functioning. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49, 807–821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bay, E. 1964. Problems, possibilities and limitations of localisation of psychic symptoms in the brain. Cortex 1, 91–102.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heilman, K.M., Schwartz, H.D. & Geschwind, N. 1975. Defective motor learning in ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 25, 1018–1020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Newcombe, F. & Ratcliff, G. 1979. Long-term psychological consequences of cerebral lesions. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: Vol. 2, neuropsychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, E. 1983. A note on the interpretation of data derived from neuropsychological tests. Cortex 19, 131–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    Miller, E. 1983. A note on the interpretation of data derived from neuropsychological tests. Cortex 19, 131–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    Miller, E. 1983. A note on the interpretation of data derived from neuropsychological tests. Cortex 19, 131–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gronwall, D. & Sampson, H. 1974. The psychological effects of concussion. Auckland, N.Z.: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Zomeren, A.H., Brouwer, W.H. & Deelman, B.G. 1984. Attentional deficits: the riddles of selectivity, speed, and alertness. In N. Brooks (Ed.), Closed head injury: psychological, social, and family consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buschke, H. & Fuld, P.A. 1974. Evaluating storage, retention and retrieval in disordered memory and learning. Neurology 24, 1019–1025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davison, L.A. 1974. Introduction. In R.M. Reitan & L.A. Davison (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: current status and applications. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Uttal, W.R. 1978. The psychobiology of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boring, E.G. 1950. A history of experimental psychology ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greenblatt, S.H. 1984. The multiple roles of Broca’s discovery in the development of ¿he modern neurosciences. Brain and Cognition 3, 249–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luria, A.R. 1980. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lezak, M.D. 1978. Living with the characterologically altered brain injured patient. J. Clin. Psychiat. 39, 592–598.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heilman, K.M., Watson, R.T. & Bowers, D. 1983. Affective disorders associated with hemispheric disease. In K.M. Heilman & P. Satz (Eds.), Neuropsychology of human emotion. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friedland, R.P. & Weinstein, E.A. 1977. Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization: introduction and historical review. In E.A, Weinstein & R.P. Friedland (Eds.), Advances in neurology, Vol. 18. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diller, L. & Weinberg, J. 1977. Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: the evolution of a rational remediation program. In E.A. Weinstein & R.P. Friedland (Eds.), Advances in neurology, Vol. 18. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Denes, G., Semenza, C., Stoppa, E. & Lis, A. 1982. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain 105, 543–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Diller, L. (1980). The development of a perceptual-remediation program in hemiplegia. In L.P. Ince (Ed.), Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Diller, L. & Weinberg, J. 1970. Evidence for accident-prone behavior in hemiplegic patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 51, 358–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    LeDoux, J.E. 1979. Parietooccipital symptomatology: the split-brain perspective. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: Vol. 2, neuropsychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joynt, R.J. & Goldstein, M.N. 1975. Minor cerebral hemisphere. In W.J. Friedlander (Ed.), Advances in Neurology, Vol. 7. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Williams, N. 1967. Correlation between copying ability and dressing activities in hemiplegia. Am. J. Phys. Med. 46, 1332–1340.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Warren, M. 1981. Relationship of constructional apraxia and body scheme disorders to dressing performance in adult CVA. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 35, 431–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baum, B. & Hall, K.M. 1981. Relationship between constructional praxis and dressing in the head-injured adult. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 35, 438–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lorenze, E.J., Cancro, R. & Sokoloff, M.A. 1961. Psychologic studies in geriatric hemiplegia. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 9, 39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lorenze, E.J. & Cancro, R. 1962. Dysfunction in visual perception with hemiplegia: its relation to activities of daily living. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 43, 514–517.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    DeCencio, D.V., Leshner, M. & Voron, D. 1970. Verticality perception and ambulation in hemiplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 51, 105–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Colarusso, R.P. & Hammill, D.D. 1972. Motor-Free Visual Perception Test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Strano, C.M. & Kent, L. 1983. Visual-perception skills: their relationship to ability to drive in the brain-injured adult. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Houston.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sivak, M., Olson, P.L., Kewman, D.G., Won, H. & Henson, D.L. 1981. Driving and perceptual/cognitive skills: behavioral consequences of brain damage. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 62, 476–483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van Zomeren, A.H., Brouwer, W.H. & Rothengatter, J.A. 1984. Fitness to drive a car after recovery from very severe closed head injury. Paper presented at annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Houston.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., Rattoki J., Ross, B., Lakin, P. & Cohen, J. 1980. Relationships between aspects of anterograde amnesia and vocational aptitude in TBD patients: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Christmas, E.M., Humphrey, M.E., Richardson, A.E. & Smith, E.M. 1974. The response of brain-damaged patients to a rehabilitation regime. Rheumatol, and Rehabil. 13, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Knight, R.G. & Godfrey, H.P.D. 1984. Reliability and validity of a scale for rating memory impairment in hospitalized amnesiacs. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 52, 769–773.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sunderland, A., Harris, J.E. & Baddeley, A.D. 1983. Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 22, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sunderland, A., Harris, J.E. & Baddeley, A.D. 1984. Assessing everyday memory aftersevere head injury. In J.E. Harris & P.E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions and absent- mindedness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harris, J.E. & Morris, P.E. (Eds.). 1984. Everyday memory, actions and absent-mindedness. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zelinski, E.M., Gilewski, M.J. & Thompson, L.W. 1980. Do laboratory tests relate to self- assessment of memory ability in the young and old? In L.W. Poon, J.L. Fozard, L.S. Cermak, D. Arenberg & L.W. Thompson (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bennett-Levy, J., Polkey, C.E. & Powell, G.E. 1980. Self-report of memory skills after temporal lobectomy: the effect of clinical variables. Cortex 16, 543–557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Crovitz, H.F., Cordoni, C.N., Daniel, W.F. & Perlman, J. 1984. Everyday forgetting experiences: real-time investigations with implications for the study of memory management in brain-damaged patients. Cortex 20, 349–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gagne, R.M. 1984. Learning outcomes and their effects. Am. Psychol. 39, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Caplan, D. 1981. On the cerebral localization of linguistic functions: logical and empirical issues surrounding deficit analysis and functional localization. Brain and Lang. 14, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kiernan, R.J. 1981. Localization of function: the mind-body problem revisited. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 3, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Luria, A.R., Naydin, V.L., Tsvetkova, L.S. & Vinarskaya, E.N. 1969. Restoration of higher cortical function following local brain damage. In P.J. Vinken & G.W. Bruyn (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Haffey, W.J. 1983. A demonstration of Luria’s qualitative neuropsychological method of cognitive remediation. Paper presented at annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Golden, C.J., Hammeke, T.A. & Purisch, A.D. 1980. The Luria-Nebraska Battery Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Diller, L., Ben-Yishay, Y., Gerstman, L.J., Goodkin, R., Gordon, W. & Weinberg, J. 1974. Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia (Rehabilitation Monograph No. 50). New York: New York University Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Weinberg, J., Diller, L., Gordon, W.A., Gerstman, L.J., Lieberman, A., Lakin, P., Hodges, G. & Ezrachi, O. 1977. Visual scanning training effect on reading-related tasks in acquired right brain damage. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 58, 479–486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Podbros, L.Z. & Noble, P.B. 1982. Elaboration strategies: their effect on memory retention in two amnesic patients. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Houston.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dougan, D.R. & Engel, J.B. 1984. A memory retraining program for nontoxic chronic alcoholics. Int. J. Neurosci. 23, 215–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gianutsos, R. 1981. Training the short- and long-term verbal recall of a postencephalitic amnesic. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 3, 143–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Patten, B.M. 1972. The ancient art of memory: usefulness in treatment. Arch. Neurol. 26, 25–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jones, M.K. 1974. Imagery as a mnemonic aid after left temporal lobectomy: contrast between material-specific and generalized memory disorders. Neuropsychologia 12, 21–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lewinsohn, P.M., Danaher, B.G. & Kikel, S. 1977. Visual imagery as a mnemonic aid for brain-injured persons. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 45, 717–723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gasparrini, B. & Satz, P. 1979. A treatment for memory problems in left hemisphere CVA patients. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 1, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rao, S.M. & Bieliauskas, L.A. 1983. Cognitive rehabilitation two and one-half years post right temporal lobectomy. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 5, 313–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sivak, M., Hill, C.S., Henson, D.L., Butler, B.P., Silber, S.M. & Olson, P.L. 1984. Improved driving performance following perceptual training in persons with brain damage. Ach. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 65, 163–167.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Weinberg, J., Piasetsky, E., Diller, L. & Gordon, W. 1982. Treating perceptual organization deficits in nonneglecting RBD stroke patients. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 4, 59–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bracy, O.D. 1982. Cognitive rehabilitation programs for brain injured and stroke patients. Indianapolis: Psychological Software Services.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gianutsos, R. & Klitzner, C. 1981. Computer programs for cognitive rehabilitation. Bayport, NY: Life Science Associates.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Grosson, B. & Buenning, W. 1984. An individualized memory retraining program after closed-head injury: a single-case study. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 6, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Grovitz, H. 1979. Memory retraining in brain-damaged patients: the airplane list. Cortex 15, 131–134.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Baron, J. 1978. Intelligence and general strategies. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cicerone, K.D. 1984. Strategy training and generalization in the cognitive remediation process. Paper presented at Fifth Annual Traumatic Head Injury Conference, Braintree, MA.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hempel, C.G. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Benson, D.F., Metter, E.J., Kuhl, D.E. & Phelps, M.E. 1983. Positron-computed tomography in neurobehavioral problems. In A. Kertesz (Ed.), Localization in neuropsychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tessa Hart
  • Mary Ellen Hayden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations