Ground Motion Measurements for the Queso Nuclear Event

  • H. David Glenn
  • T. F. Stubbs
  • J. A. Kalinowski

Abstract

QUESO was a low yield nuclear event detonated at a depth of 216.4 m in hole U10bf at the Nevada Test Site on August 11, 1982. Shock wave histories containing the peak residual stress values were obtained for the first time in free field measurements. Radial and tangential stress measurements indicated a strong residual stress field was induced above the cavity by 200 ms after the nuclear detonation, following rebound of that region after passage of the ground shock. Free field particle velocity profiles corresponded closely with measurements made at comparable ranges in the emplacement hole.

Keywords

Clay Porosity Attenuation Explosive Magnetite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.S. Kahn, R.W. Terhune, H.D. Glenn, and B.K. Crowley, “Increasing DNA’s Test Site Real Estate,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Internal Document UCON 74–32, Memo to Carl Keller, Defense Nuclear Agency Headquarters, Albuquerque, NM, (Apr. 1975). Readers outside the lab who wish further information on LLNL internal documents should address inquiries to Technical Information Dept., LLNL, Livermore, CA 94550.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.W. Terhune, H.D. Glenn, D.E. Burton, and J.T. Rambo, “Containment Analysis for the Simultaneous Detonation of Two Nuclear Explosives,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Rept. UCRL-52268 (Apr. 1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Rimer, “The Influence of Clay and Water in Rocks on Containment of Underground Nuclear Explosions,” Systems, Science, and Software Rept. SSS-R-77-3339 (June 1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.W. Terhune, H.D. Glenn, D.E. Burton, H.L. McKague, and J.T. Rambo, “Numerical Simulation of the BANEBERRY Event”. Nuclear Technology 46, (November 1979).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.L. Florence and R.W. Gates, “Explosive Cavity Residual Stress Measurements”, Stanford Research Institute Rept. TR-76-3702-3 (1976).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.W. Smith, “PUFF TOO: A Residual Stress Experiment”, Sandia National Laboratory Rept. SAND 79–1674 (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.D. Glenn, T.F. Stubbs, J.A. Kalinowski, and E.C. Woodward, “Ground Motion Data and Containment Analysis for the QUESO Nuclear Event,” LLNL Rept. UCRL-53457, (Oct. 1983), ( Title U, Report CFRD).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.D. Glenn, “Diagnostics Techniques Improvement Program”, Defense Nuclear Agency Report, Systems, Science & Software Rept DNA2978T (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.W. Terhune, LLNL, private communication (1982).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.L. Florence, D.D. Keough, and R. Mak, “Calculational Evaluation of the Inclusion Effects on Stress Gage Measurements in Rock and Soil”, Proc. Interaction of Non-Nuclear Munitions in Structures Symp., 10–13 May 1983, USAF Academy, Colorado Springs, CO.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.W. Olsen, “Stress Measurement Development at LLNL”, Proc. Monterey Containment Symp., Vol. II, 26–28 August 1981, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, (Title U, Report CFRD).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.W. Terhune and H.D. Glenn, “Estimate of Residual Shear Strength Around Explosive Cavities in Earth Media”, Proc. 19th U.S. Symp. Rock Mech., Stateline, NV, (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. David Glenn
    • 1
  • T. F. Stubbs
    • 2
  • J. A. Kalinowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUSA
  2. 2.EG&G Inc.San RamonUSA

Personalised recommendations