The Effect of Unconsolidated Sediment Rigidity on Low Frequency Acoustic Propagation

  • J. H. Beebe
  • C. W. Holland
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 16)


Most unconsolidated ocean sediments have been reported to possess small, but finite rigidity. In sandy sediments rigidity is due to sliding and rolling friction resulting from the interlocking grain structure; in silt clays rigidity is due to cohesion. For many marine environments acoustic propagation is not measurably affected by sediment rigidity. In some environments, however, the effect of sediment rigidity is the dominant mechanism in modal attenuation. Two coastal regions on the Scotian shelf will be contrasted by comparing the effects of sediment shear wave excitation on transmission loss at low frequency. The key environmental factor in unconsolidated sediment shear wave excitation is not the intrinsic sediment properties but the degree of elastic contrast found in the acoustic field.


Shear Wave Acoustic Field Transmission Loss Acoustic Propagation Scotian Shelf 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. J. Fryer, Reflectivity of the Ocean Bottom at Low Frequency, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63: 35 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. J. Vidmar, The Dependence of Bottom Reflection Loss on the Geoacoustic Parameters of Deep Sea (Solid) Sediments, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 68: 1442 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Akal and F. B. Jensen, Effects of the Sea-Bed on Acoustic Propagation, in: “Acoustics and the Sea-Bed,” N. G. Pace, ed., Bath University Press, Bath, UK, (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. D. Macpherson and N. O. Fothergill, Study of Low Frequency Sound Progagation in the Hartlen Point Region of the Scotian Shelf, J. Acoust. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34: 967 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. D. Worley and R. A. Walker, Low-Frequency Ambient Ocean Noise and Sound Transmission Over a Thinly Sedimented Rock Bottom, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71: 863 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J, H. Beebe and S. T. McDaniel, Geoacoustical Models of the Seabed to Support Range-Dependent Propagation Studies on the Scotian Shelf, in “Bottom Interacting Ocean Acoustics,” W. Kuperman and F. Jensen, ed., Plenum Press, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. B. Gaspin and V. K. Shuler, “Source Levels of Shallow Underwater Explosions,” Naval Ordnance Laboratory Report, NOLTR 71–160 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. D. Hughes, Low Frequency Underwater Explosive Source Levels, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 60: 572 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. R. Parrot, D. J. Dodds, L. H. King, and R. G. Simpkins, “Measurement and Evaluation of the Acoustic Reflectivity of the Sea Floor,” Huntec Report H7903-02/SB/DRP, presented at the First Canadian Conference on Marine Geotechnical Engineering, March 5, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. S. Anderson, Statistical Correlation of Physical Properties and Sound Velocity in Sediments, in: “Physics of Sound in Marine Sediments,” Loyd Hampton, ed., Plenum Press, New York (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Handbook of Physical Constants - Revised Edition,” the Geological Society of America Memoir 97 (1966).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. D. Stoll, Acoustic Waves in Saturated Sediments, in: “Physics of Sound in Marine Sediments,” Loyd Hampton, ed., Plenum Press, New York (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. L. Hamilton, Geoacoustic Modeling of the Sea Floor, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68: 1313 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Ingenito, R. H. Ferris, W. A. Kuperman, and S. N. Wolf, “Shallow Water Acoustics: Summary Report (First Phase),” Naval Research Laboratory, NRL Report 8179 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. H. Beebe, S. T. McDaniel, and L. A. Rubano, Shallow-Water Transmission Loss Prediction Using the Biot Sediment Model, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 71: 1417 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Personal CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. A. Haskell, The Dispersion of Surface Waves on Multilayered Media, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 43: 17 (1953).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Beebe
    • 1
  • C. W. Holland
    • 2
  1. 1.Applied Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Planning Systems Inc.McLeanUSA

Personalised recommendations