Advertisement

Merits of Simple Intervention

  • Bruce Ritson
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (ABBI, volume 13)

Abstract

This chapter concerns the growth of an idea about the merits of simple intervention. At the outset, I should own up to the bias of my own vantage point, that of a psychiatrist working within the United Kingdom National Health Service. It is important to acknowledge this particular perspective because it has determined the clinical influences that I feel have been important. Shedding firmly held beliefs about treatment is a disconcerting and unnerving process, particularly when new beliefs come to be held with equal tenacity. Are the new beliefs about simple intervention based on convincing evidence or are they simply the latest fashion waiting to be discarded for the next season’s model? In 1977, The Lancet commented on current approaches to services for alcoholics thus:

This treatment approach owes its existence more to historical process than to science. It is possible to discern the deposits, akin to geological layers, of a sequence of therapeutic fashions—the residue of almost forgotten enthusiasms for in-patient psychotherapy units, for group processes and the therapeutic community, for family therapy and later for community psychiatry. To say that treatment for alcoholism is only an accretion of fads and fashions would be too harsh, for it is also built on much clinical experience; but it must be admitted that we have not done enough to assess scientifically the effectiveness of treatment methods. (Lancet, 1977, p. 489)

Keywords

Alcohol Problem Simple Intervention Drinking Habit Frontline Worker Contemplation Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chick, J. (1984). Secondary prevention of alcoholism and Centres d’Hygiene Alimentaire. British Journal of Addiction, 79, 221–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chick, J., Lloyd, G., & Crombie, E. (1984). Counselling problem drinkers in medical wards: A controlled study. British Medical journal, 290, 965–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clare, A. W. (1980). How good is treatment? In G. Edwards & M. Grant (Eds.), Alcoholism: New knowledge and new responses (pp. 279–289 ). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  4. Department of Health and Social Security. (1978). The pattern and range of services for problem drinkers. Report by Advisory Committee on Alcoholism. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  5. Editors. (1977). The Alcoholism treatment package. Lancet, 2, 488–490.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, G. (1982). The treatment of drinking problems. London: Grant McIntyre.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, G., & Guthrie, S. (1967). A controlled trial of in-patient and out-patient treatment of alcohol dependence. Lancet, 1, 555–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glaser, F. B. (1980). Anybody got a match? Treatment research and the matching hypothesis. In G. Edwards & M. Grant (Eds.), Alcoholism treatment in transition. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  9. Kristenson, H. (1982). Studies on alcohol-related disabilities in a medical intervention program: in middle-aged males. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Lund.Google Scholar
  10. Levinson, T., & Sereny, G. (1969). An experimental evaluation of ‘insight therapy’ for the chronic alcoholic. Journal of Canadian Psychiatric Association, 5, 14–18.Google Scholar
  11. Miller, W., & Taylor, C. A. (1980). Relative effectiveness of bibliotherapy, individual and group self-control training in the treatment of problem drinkers. Addictive Behaviours, 5, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McAllister, A., Puska, P., Salonen, J. T., Tuomilehlo,J., & Koohela, K. (1982). Theory and action for health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 72, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Orford, J., & Edwards, G. (1977). Alcoholism. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice, 19, 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ritson, B., & De Roumanie, M. (1984). Community attitudes and responses. In N. Krasner, J. Madden, & R. Walker (Eds.), Alcohol related problems (pp. 267–279 ). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Russell, M. A. H., Wilson, C., Taylor, C., & Baker, C. D. (1979). Effect of general practitioners’ advice against smoking. British Medical Journal, 285, 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw, S., Cartwright, A., Spratley, T., & Harwin, J. (1978). Responding to drinking problems. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  18. World Health Organisation. (1983a). Community response to alcohol related problems. Geneva: WHO MNH/83.17. Author.Google Scholar
  19. World Health Organisation. (1983b). Seventh general programme of work, global medium-term programme. Geneva: Programme 10. MNH.MTP/83.19. AuthorGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Ritson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh HospitalEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations