Abstract
In my talk, I have claimed that the following statement brings the essence of Bell’s theorem : “It is impossible to mimick the quantum mechanical predictions for the EPR correlations, with a reasonable classical-looking model, in the spirit of Einstein’s ideas”. Then Azim Barut disputed this statement. He did so in what would be the most decisive way, that is to say by exhibiting a counter-example, I must say that I would be completely convinced that I am wrong if somebody could make a classical model (i.e. following the laws of classical physics) mimicking all the quantum mechanical predictions for the E.P.R. correlations. But I intend to show here that it is not the case for Barut’s model, for the following reasons:
-
1)
the first version of his model is classical, but doesn’t mimick at all an E.P.R. type experiment;
-
2)
by reinterpretation we can get a model that does mimick the experiment, but this model is no longer “reasonable classical looking” since it involves negative probabilities.
See this volume
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aspect, A. (1986). Comment on “A classical model of EPR Experiment with Quantum Mechanical Correlations and Bell Inequalities”. In: Moore, G.T., Scully, M.O. (eds) Frontiers of Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics. NATO ASI Series, vol 135. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2181-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2181-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9284-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2181-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive