Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Chapman and Hall Advanced Industrial Technology Series ((AITS))

  • 607 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic manipulators are complex (coupled and nonlinear) multi-variable mechanical systems that are designed to perform specific tasks. The versatile robot arm dynamic simulation tool VAST (Ref. 1) has been created to provide a user-friendly working environment in which to simulate and interpret the physical characteristics of robot and actuator dynamics and design and evaluate feedback controllers for robotic manipulators. The development and features of VAST are highlighted in this article. The simulator structure is flexible, versatile, and amenable to further development. The simulator has been designed to become the foundation of a robot-oriented CAD (computer-aided design) system.

The author expresses his appreciation to Michael S. Pfeifer for implementing VAST and to Professor Arthur C. Sanderson for making computational facilities available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pfeifer, M. S., and C. P. Neuman: “VAST: A Versatile Robot Arm Dynamic Simulation Tool,” Computers in Mechanical Engineering, 3 (3) 57–64, November 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, C. S. G.: “Robot Arm Kinematics, Dynamics, and Control,” Computer 15 (12) 62–80, December 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hollerbach, J. M.: “A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Manipulator Dynamics and a Comparative Study of Dynamic Formulation Complexity,” IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-lO(11) 730–736, November 1980.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Luh, J. Y. S., Walker, M. W., and R. P. C. Paul: “On-Line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators,” J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 102 (2) 69–76, June 1980.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker, M. W., and D. E. Orin: “Efficient Dynamic Computer Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms,” J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 104 (3) 205–211, September 1982.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Swartz, N. M.: “Arm Dynamics Simulation,” J. of Robotics Systems, 1 (1) 83–100, Spring 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khosla, P. K., and C. P. Neuman: “Computational Requirements of Customized Newton-Euler Algorithms,” J. of Robotic Systems, 2 (3) 309–327, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuman, C. P., and J. J. Murray: “Linearization and Sensitivity Functions of Dynamic Robot Models,” IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 14 (6) 805–818, November/December 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul, R. P. C.: “Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control,” MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brady, M., et al. eds: “Robot Motion,” MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luh, J. Y. S.: “An Anatomy of Industrial Robots and Their Controls,” IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control AC- 28 (2) 133–153, February 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray, J. J., and C. P. Neuman: “ARM: An Algebraic Robot Dynamic Modeling Program,” in Proc. of the First IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Robotics (R.P.C. Paul, Ed), 103–114, Atlanta, Georgia, March 13–15, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heginbotham, W. B., Ed.: “Industrial Robots of the World,” Industrial Robot 10 (3) 214–217, December 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuo, B. C.: “Automatic Control Systems,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Stone, H. W., and C. P. Neuman: “Dynamic Modeling of a Three Degree-of-Freedom Robotic Manipulator,” IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 14 (4) 643–654, July/August 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tourassis, V. D., and C. P. Neuman: “Properties and Structure of Dynamic Robot Models for Control Engineering Applications,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 20 (1) 27–40, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rice, J. R.: “Numerical Methods, Software and Analysis,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. “UNIX Programmer’s Manual,” 7th Ed. (CMU Abridged), Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., Murray Hill, New Jersey, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luh, J. Y. S.: “Conventional Controller Design for Industrial Robots—A Tutorial,” IEEE Trans. On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-13 (3) 298–316, May/June 1983.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Markiewicz, B. R.: “Analysis of the Computed Torque Drive Method and Comparison with Conventional Position Servo for a Computer-Controlled Manipulator,” Tech. Memorandum 33–601, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, March 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luh, J. Y. S., Walker, M. W and R. P. C. Paul: “Resolved-Acceleration Control of Mechanical Manipulators,” IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control AC-25 (3) 468–474, June 1980.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bejezy, A. K.: “Robot Arm Dynamics and Control,” Tech. Memorandum 33–669, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, February 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carnahan, B., Luther, H. A., and J. O. Wilkes: “Applied Numerical Methods,” Wiley, New York, 1969.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Collatz, L.: “The Numerical Treatment of Differential Equations,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1960.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Engelberger, J. F.: “Robotics in Practice,” Amacon Div. of American Management, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tourassis, V. D., and C. P. Neuman: “Robust Nonlinear Feedback Control for Robotic Manipulators,” IEE Proc. D: Control Theory and Applications. (Special issue on Robotics), 132 (4) 134–143, July 1985.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Tourassis, V. D., and C. P. Neuman: “Robust Feedback Control of an Articulated Robot: A Case-Study,” Proc. of 24th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 1505–1509, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, December 11–13, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis, R. A.: “Autonomous Manipulation on a Robot: Summary of Manipulator Software Functions,” Tech. Memorandum 33–679, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, March 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Douglas M. Considine (Registered Professional Engineer (California) in Control Engineering)Glenn D. Considine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Chapman and Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neuman, C.P. (1986). A Robot Dynamics Simulator. In: Considine, D.M., Considine, G.D. (eds) Standard Handbook of Industrial Automation. Chapman and Hall Advanced Industrial Technology Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1963-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1963-4_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9166-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1963-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics