Skip to main content

Spontaneous Drawing in an Unselected Sample of Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Damage

  • Chapter
Duality and Unity of the Brain

Part of the book series: Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series ((WGCISS,volume 47))

  • 143 Accesses

Summary

Spontaneous drawing tasks were administered to a large series of patients selected only for unilateral damage to the left or right cerebral hemisphere. Aphasic patients were not excluded. Overall, patients with left-hemisphere lesions performed more poorly than those with right-hemisphere lesions, whether one considered crude ratings of the pictures, or detailed scoring measures. Patients who were manually apraxic and/or aphasic were by far the most impaired. Only a small number of patients with right-hemisphere lesions made very poor drawings, and as a group they tended to show neglect by other criteria, and to have a significant hemiparesis. Restricted damage within the left hemisphere, particularly of the anterior region, still yielded a high incidence of poor drawings, but this was much less true in the right hemisphere. It appears that drawing/constructional ability is more diffusely organized in the right hemisphere than in the left.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arena, A. and Gainotti, G. (1978). Constructional apraxia and visuoperceptive disabilities in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Cortex, 14, 463–473.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrigoni, G. and de Renzi, E. (1964). Constructional apraxia and hemisphere locus of lesion. Cortex, 1, 170–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. (1968). Differential behavioural effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia, 6, 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. (1979). Visuoperceptive, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. In Clinical Neuropsychology. (eds. K. Heilman and E. Valenstein). New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 186–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L.M. (1982). Constructional strategies on complex figure drawings after unilateral brain damage. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 51–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodal, A. (1981). Neurological Anatomy. New York, Oxford, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, A., de Renzi, E. and Faglioni, P. (1976). The occurrence of visual neglect in patients with unilateral cerebral disease. Cortex, 12, 221–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corkin, S., Milner, B. and Rasmussen, T. (1970). Somatosensory thresholds. Archives of Neurology, 23 ,41–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denny-Brown, D. and Chambers, R.A. (1958). The parietal lobe and behavior. In The Brain and Human Behavior, Proceeds of the Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 36, 35–117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlinger, G., Warrington, E. and Zangwill, O.L. (1957). A further study of visualspatial agnosia. Brain, 80, 335–361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gainotti, G. and Tiacci, C. (1970). Patterns of drawing disability in right and left hemispheric patients. Neuropsychologia, 8, 379–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparrini, B., Shealy, C. and Walters, D. (1980). Differences in size and spatial placement of drawings of left versus right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 670–672.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hécaen, H. (1962). Clinical symptomatology in right and left hemispheric lesions. In Interhemispheric Relations and cerebral Dominance. (ed. V.B. Mountcastle). Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 215–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Gotman, M. and Milner, B. (1977). Design fluency: the invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 15, 653–674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1977). Acquisition of a motor skill after left-hemisphere damage. Brain 100, 527–542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1979). Neuromotor mechanisms in the evolution of human communication. In Neurobiology of Social Communication in Primates. (eds. H.D. Steklis and M.J. Raleigh). New York, Academic Press, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1984a). Neuropsychology Test Procedures, DK Consultants, London, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1984b). Visual search in patients with unilateral lesions. Perception Seminar, York University, Toronto, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D., Barnett, H.J.M. and Burkhart, G. (1981). The psychological test pattern in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neuropsychologia, 19, 301–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. and Harshman, R.A. (1984). Sex differences in brain organization for verbal and non-verbal functions. In Sex Differences in the Brain. Progress in Brain Re search. (eds. G.J. de Vries, J.P.C. de Bruin, H.B.M. UyLings and M.A. Corner) . Elsevier, Amsterdam, 61, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFie, J., Piercy, M.F. and Zangwill, O.L. (1950). Visual-spatial agnosia associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 73, 167–190.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFie, J. and Zangwill, O.L. (1960). Visual-constructive disabilities associated with lesions of the left cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 83, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, B. (1964). Some effects of frontal lobectomy in man. In The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior. (eds. J.M. Warren and K. Akert). New York, McGraw Hill, 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monakow, C. von. (1914). Die Localisation im Grosshirn, Wiesbaden, Bergmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, M., Hécaen, H. and de Ajuriaguerra, J. (1960). Constructional apraxia associated with unilateral cerebral lesions -left and right sided cases compared. Brain, 83, 225–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renzi, E. de and Vignolo, L. (1962). The Token Test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain, 85, 665–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semmes, J. (1965). A non-tactual factor in astereognosis. Neuropsychologia, 3, 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E.K., James, M. and Kinsbourne, M. (1966). Drawing ability in relation to laterality of cerebral lesion. Brain, 89, 53–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whishnant, J.P. (1983). The role of the neurologist in the decline of stroke. Annals of Neurology, 14, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, B.T. and Teuber, H-L. (1978). Changing patterns of childhood aphasia. Annals of Neurology, 3, 273–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 The Wenner-Gren Center

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kimura, D., Faust, R. (1987). Spontaneous Drawing in an Unselected Sample of Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Damage. In: Ottoson, D. (eds) Duality and Unity of the Brain. Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series, vol 47. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1949-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1949-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9081-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1949-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics