Skip to main content

Variations in Arousal Asymmetry: Implications for Face Processing

  • Chapter
Book cover Duality and Unity of the Brain

Part of the book series: Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series ((WGCISS,volume 47))

Abstract

A variety of findings suggest a highly consistent pattern of hemispheric specialization in dextrals, characterized by left hemisphere superiority for processes utilized in language tasks and right hemisphere superiority for processes utilized in spatial tasks as well as in the perception of non-verbal auditory stimuli. Evidence for this pattern comes from studies of the cognitive abilities of the isolated hemispheres of commissurotomy patients (e.g., Levy et al., 1972; Sperry, 1974), from the rarity of aphasic symptoms following right hemisphere damage in dextrals (e.g., Weisenburg & McBride, 1935; Kimura, 1983), as well as from sodium amytal tests which indicate that 95–99% of dextrals have language output functions lateralized to the left hemisphere (e.g., Wada & Rasmussen, 1960; Rasmussen & Milner, 1977).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blumstein, S., Goodglass, H. and Tarttar, V. (1975). The reliability of ear asymmetry in dichotic listening. Brain and Language, 2, 226–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryden, M.P. (1982). Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the In tact Brain. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. (1985). Sex Differences in Cerebral Asymmetry. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, C., Dronkers, N.F. and Hardyck, C. (1984). Choosing sides: on the variability of language lateralization in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 22, 363–374.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gur, R.E. and Gur, R.C. (1975). Defense mechanisms, psychosomatic symtomatology, and conjugate lateral eye movements. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 416–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gur, R.E. and Reivich, M. (1980). Cognitive task effects on hemispheric blood flow in humans: Evidence for individual differences in hemispheric activation. Brain and Language, 9 ,78–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, K.M. and Van Den Abell, T. (1979). Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation. Neuropsychologia, 17, 315–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1983). Speech representation in an unbiased sample of left-handers. Human Neurobiology, 2 ,147–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne, M. (1972). Eye and head turning indicates cerebral lateralization. Science, 176, 539–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsner, K. and Schwartz, S. (1986). Words and hemifields: Do the hemispheres enjoy equal opportunity? Brain and Cognition, 5 ,354–361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leehey, S.C., Carey, S., Diamond, R. and Cahn, A. (1978). Upright and inverted faces: The right hemisphere knows the difference. Cortex, 14, 411–419.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S.C., Banich, M.T. and Koch-Weser, M. (1984). Variations in patterns of lateral asymmetry among dextrals. Brain and Cognition, 3 ,317–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M.T. and Burton, L. (1983a). Are variations among right-handers in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9 ,329–359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M.T. and Burton, L. (1983b). Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces. Brain and Cognition, 2 ,404–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., Trevarthen, C. and Sperry, R.W. (1972). Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. Brain, 100, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, T. and Milner, B. (1977). The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. In Evolution and Lateralization of the Brain. (eds. S.J. Diamond and D.A. Blizard). New York Academy of Science, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. and Turkewitz, G. (1981). Individual differences in cerebral asymmetries for facial recognition. Cortex, 17 ,199–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Kossak, P. and Turkewitz, G. (in press). A micro and macro developmental view of the nature of changes in complex information processing: A consideration of changes in hemispheric advantage during familiarization. To appear in Neuropsychology of facial expression. (ed. R. Bruyer). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, R.W. (1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. In The neurosciences: Third study program. (eds. F. Schmitt and F. Worden). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, E.L. (1981). Dichotic ear difference is a poor indicator for the functional asymmetry between the cerebral hemispheres. Neuro-psychologia, 19, 235–240.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1972). Brain bisymmetry and the role of the corpus callosum in behavior and conscious experience. In Cerebral hemisp here relations. (eds. J. Cernacek and F. Podivinsky). Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, Czechoslovakia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, S.K. and Tucker, D.M. (1982). Anxiety and perceptual structure: Individual differences in neuropsychological function. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 210–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wada and Rasmussen (1960). Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal and the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. Experimental and clinical observations. Journal of Neurosurgery, 17, 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisenburg, T. and McBride, K.E. (1935). Aphasia, a clinical and psychological study. Commonwealth Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, B.E., Halwes, T. and Heniger, G.R. (1981). Use of statistical significance criterion in drawing inferences about hemispheric dominance for language function from dichotic listening data. Brain and Language, 13, 13–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1969). Laterality differences in perception: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 72 ,387–405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 The Wenner-Gren Center

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levine, S.C., Banich, M.T., Kim, H. (1987). Variations in Arousal Asymmetry: Implications for Face Processing. In: Ottoson, D. (eds) Duality and Unity of the Brain. Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series, vol 47. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1949-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1949-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9081-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1949-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics