Advertisement

Influence of Microstructure on Creep Rupture

  • S. M. Wiederhorn
  • B. J. Hockey
  • R. F. KrauseJr.
Part of the Materials Science Research book series (MSR, volume 21)

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of microstructure on both the creep and creep rupture behavior of two commercial grades of vitreous bonded aluminum oxide was investigated. Deformation and fracture occurred within the ductile, intergranular phase of the material. The creep rate was relatively insensitive to the amount of intergranular phase, but was sensitive to structural details of that phase. The creep rate could be reduced by increasing both the degree of crystallization of the intergranular phase and the viscosity of residual glass within that phase. The time-to-rupture and the strain-at-rupture increased as the amount of intergranular phase within the material increased. In this regard, an increase in the amount of intergranular phase permitted greater accommodation of strain, and hence, blunting of cavities that nucleated during the creep process. The data fit a modified Monkman-Grant curve in which the Monkman-Grant coefficient was sensitive to both stress and the amount of intergranular phase. The Monkman-Grant coefficient was not sensitive, however, to the degree of crystallization of the intergranular phase.

Keywords

Creep Rate Crack Opening Displacement Binder Phase Creep Rupture Rupture Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. M. Wiederhorn, B.J. Hockey, R.F. Krause, Jr. and K. Jakus, “Creep and Fracture of a Vitreous-Bonded Aluminum Oxide,” J. Mater. Sci. 21, 810–824 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. W. Hollenberg, G.R. Terwilliger and R.S. Gordon, “Calculation of Stress and Strains in Four-Point Bending Creep Tests,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54, 196–199 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. M. Wiederhorn, L. Chuck, E.R. Fuller, Jr. and N.J. Tighe, “Creep Rupture of Siliconized Silicon Carbide,” pp. 755–774 in Tailoring Multiphase Ceramics, R.E. Tressler, G.L. Messing and C.G. Pantano, eds. Plenum Press, New York (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. F. Carroll, R. E. Tressler, Y. Tsai and C. Near, “High Temperature Mechanical Properties of Siliconized Silicon Carbide Composites,” pp. 775–788 in ref. 3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Cohrt, G. Grathwohl and F. Thummler, “Strengthening after Creep of Reaction-Bonded Siliconized Silicon Carbide,” pp. 515–526 in Creep and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, B. Wilshire and D.R.J. Owen, eds., Pineridge Press, Swansea, U.K. (1984).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Jakus, S.M. Wiederhorn and B.J. Hockey, “Nucleation and Growth of Cracks in Vitreous-Bonded Aluminum Oxide at Elevated Temperatures,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 (1986) October issue.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. L. Swanson, C.J. Fairbanks, B.R. Lawn, Y-W Mai and B.J. Hockey, “Crack-Interface Grain Bridging as a Fracture Resistance Mechanism in Ceramics: I. Experimental Study on Alumina,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., in press (1987).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. M. Pharr and M.F. Ashby, “On Creep Enhanced by a Liquid Phase,” Acta Met. 31, 129–38 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. F. Lange,: “Non-Elastic Deformation of Polycrystals with a Liquid Boundary Phase,” pp. 361–381 in Deformation of Ceramic Materials, R.C. Bradt and R.E. Tressler, eds. Plenum Press, New York (1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.C. Drucker, “Engineering and Continuum Aspects of High-Strength Materials,” pp. 795–833 in High Strength Materials, V.F. Zackay, ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1965).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Raj, “Creep in Polycrystalline Aggregates by Matter Transport Through a Liquid Phase,” J. Geophys. Res. 87 [B6], 4731–39 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Raj and C.K. Chyung, “Solution-Precipitation Creep in Glass Ceramics,” Acta Met. 29, 159–66 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. W. Durney, “Solution-transfer, an Important Geological Deformation Mechanism,” Nature, 235, 315–16 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. W. Durney, “Pressure Solution and Crystallization Deformation,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A283. 229–40 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. H. Rutter, “The Kinetics of Rock Deformation by Pressure Solution,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A283, 203–219 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. L. Stocker and M.F. Ashby, “On the Rheology of the Upper Mantle,” Rev. Geophys. and Space Phys. 11, 391–421 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. Reynolds, “On the Dilatancy of Media Composed of Rigid Particles in Contact, with Experimental Illustrations,” Phil. Mag. 20, 469–81 (1885).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. C. Frank, “On Dilatancy in Relation to Seismic Sources,” Rev. Geophysics, 3, 485 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.-G. Wang and R. Raj, “Mechanisms of Superplastic Flow in a Fine-Grained Ceramic Containing some Liquid Phase,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 399–409 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. C. Monkman and N.J. Grant, “An Empirical Relationship between Rupture Life and Minimum Creep Rate in Creep-Rupture Tests,” Proc. ASTM 56, 593–620 (1956).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Wiederhorn
    • 1
  • B. J. Hockey
    • 1
  • R. F. KrauseJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Materials Science and EngineeringNational Bureau of StandardsGaithersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations