Current Trends in the Use of Computer Technology by Human Resource Managers

  • Jo Ann Verdin
  • Anthony M. Pagano


There have been a number of studies examining the characteristics of Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS) in large corporations (Magnus & Grossman, 1985; Mathys, LaVan & Nogal, 1984), how systems are liked to various human resource functions (Amico, 1981; Hoff, 1983; LaPointe, 1983; Weirmair, 1981), and factors related to the planning, implementation and development of HRIS systems (Ceriello, 1984; Simon, 1983). In general, the vast majority of large companies have some type of HRIS system available, at least for basic payroll, record-keeping and administrative tasks. Applications include compensation, benefits, EEO/AA, applicant tracking, training and development, labor relations, turnover analysis, and human resource planning. The focus of this research, however, has been on characteristics of the computer system rather than who uses the information and how its use might affect productivity and quality of output.


Human Resource Computer Technology Human Resource Manager Financial Service Applicant Tracking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amico, Anthony M., “Computerized Career Information,” Personnel Journal, Vol. 60 (August, 1981), pp. 632–633.Google Scholar
  2. Ceriello, Vincent R., “Computerizing the Personnel Department: How Do You Pick the Right Software?” Personnel Journal, Vol. 63 (November, 1984), pp. 53–58.Google Scholar
  3. Gutek, B. A., Bikson, T. K., & Mankin, D., “Individual and Organizational Consequences of Computer-based Office Information Technology,” In S. Oskamp (Ed.) Applied Social Psychology Annual, Vol. 5, (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, in press).Google Scholar
  4. Helferich, Omar K., “Computers that Mimic Human Thought: Artificial Intelligence for Materials and Logistics Management,” Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 5, No. 2 (1984) pp. 123–127.Google Scholar
  5. Hoff, Roger D., “The Impact of Cafeteria Benefits on the Human Resource Information System,” Personnel Journal, Vol. 62 (April , 1983), pp. 282–283.Google Scholar
  6. LaPointe, Joel R., “Human Resource Performance Indexes, ”Personnel Journal, Vol. 62 (July, 1983), pp. 545–553.Google Scholar
  7. Magee, John F., “SMR Forum: What Information Technology Has in Store for Managers,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 26 (Winter, 1985), pp 45–49.Google Scholar
  8. Mathys, Nicholas & LaVan, Helen, “A Survey of the Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS) of Major Companies,” Human Resource Planning, Vol. 5 (June, 1982), pp. 83–90.Google Scholar
  9. Mathys, Nicholas, LaVan, Helen, & Nogal, Garry, “Issue in Purchasing and Implementing HRIS Software,” Personnel Administrator, Vol. 29, No. 8 (August, 1984) pp 91–97.Google Scholar
  10. Magnus, Margaret & Grossman, Mort, “Computers and the Personnel Department,” Personnel Journal, Vol. 64 (April, 1985) pp. 42–48.Google Scholar
  11. Murdick, Robert G. & Schuter, Fred, “Computerized Information Support for the Human Resource Function,” Human Resource Planning, Vol. 6 (March, 1983, PP. 25–33.Google Scholar
  12. Quillard, J. A., Rockart, J. F., Wilde, E., Vernon, M., & Mock, G. A Study of the Corporate Use of Personnel Computers, (Center for Information Systems Research, Working Paper 109). Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Ann Verdin
    • 1
  • Anthony M. Pagano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations